
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Est. Listeners
Based on iTunes & Spotify (publisher stats).
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
25,001 - 50,000 - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
75,001 - 150,000 - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
15,001 - 40,000
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
Recent episodes
S1M0NE • Member Bonus
Apr 30, 2026
10m 16s
Brian and Charles
Apr 30, 2026
58m 59s
I Am Mother
Apr 23, 2026
1h 01m 34s
Ex Machina
Apr 16, 2026
58m 37s
Her
Apr 9, 2026
1h 05m 44s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Description | Length | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/30/26 | ![]() S1M0NE • Member Bonus | The Thinking Machines series concludes with the April member bonus: "S1M0NE," Andrew Niccol's satirical science fiction comedy about Viktor Taransky, a fading Hollywood director played by Al Pacino, who inherits a program capable of generating a digital actress—and unleashes her on an unsuspecting world alongside Catherine Keener as his producer ex-wife and Winona Ryder as the star she replaces.Pete and Andy take apart the film's central failure—Simone is a puppet, not an AI, which means the Frankenstein premise the film keeps setting up never pays off—and debate whether Niccol's Hollywood satire ever finds its blade. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we conclude the Thinking Machines series with a member bonus conversation about "S1M0NE." We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in—The Next Reel on TruStory FM, when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd | Trailer If You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family: The Next Reel: Thinking Machines series—keep going with the full arc; this conversation fits best in context of where the series has been This is a member bonus episode. The movie ends—and for members, the conversation keeps going. Monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord access, and a vote on future member movies. Become a member of The Next Reel family and always know what to listen to next. | 10m 16s | ||||||
| 4/30/26 | ![]() Brian and Charles | Something wondrous happens when you build a robot from a washing machine. “Brian and Charles,” the finale of The Next Reel’s Thinking Machines series, follows Brian (David Earl), a lonely Welsh inventor, and Charles Popescu (Chris Hayward), the AI companion Brian assembles—who promptly learns English from a dictionary and wants to see the world. Louise Brealey co-stars as Hazel.Pete and Andy dig into what makes Charles Popescu work—Hayward’s sightless performance, the voice design, and why the amateurishness is right. The docu-style drives debate: Andy finds it inconsistently applied; Pete says the gap between promise and absurdity is where the comedy lives. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in—The Next Reel on TruStory FM, when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎥 Watch this episode on YouTube!🎬 Watch & DiscoverWatch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | LetterboxdOriginal Short FilmOriginal Theatrical TrailerIf You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family:The Next Reel—Thinking Machines Series—the full run leading here; see how Brian and Charles lands as a closer after everything that came beforeThe Next Reel—The Banshees of Inisherin—both films competed for Outstanding British Film at the same BAFTAs; see how the conversation comparesMovies We Like—Re-Recording Mixer Andy Nelson on Local Hero—another warmhearted British film rooted in a small community and a sense of placeMovies We Like—Costume Designer Alana Morshead on Never Let Me Go—Alex Garland wrote the screenplay; he directed Ex Machina earlier in this series, and this is where his AI themes find their quietest form🔓 The movie ends. The conversation goes further. Become a member.🎧 Members get this episode early and ad-free in their private feed—plus every show in The Next Reel family. Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 58m 59s | ||||||
| 4/23/26 | ![]() I Am Mother | “I hope you see that I’m governed by different parameters than her assailants. That I’m a good mother. Have I ever done you harm?”When an AI raises a child in a sealed bunker after an extinction event, the question isn't whether the machine can be trusted—it's whether the child has any other choice. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about "I Am Mother." Directed by Grant Sputore in his feature debut from a Black List screenplay he developed with writer Michael Lloyd Green, the film stars Clara Rugaard as Daughter and Hilary Swank as the mysterious Woman who arrives from the outside world, with Rose Byrne voicing Mother and Luke Hawker performing the physical role inside WetaFX's practical robot suit.We dig into why Mother may be the most unsettling AI the series has given us precisely because she genuinely cares, what the trolley problem test sequences are really measuring, and how Clara Rugaard carries the whole film with a performance that left both of us wondering why she isn't in everything. We also get into WetaFX's practical suit work, the film's relationship to the genre vocabulary it borrows from—Blade Runner, The Matrix, James Cameron—and where I Am Mother lands in an arc that has covered AI enforcement, violation, transcendence, and escape. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover 🎥 Our Conversation on YouTube 🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd 📽️ TrailerIf You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family: The Next Reel: The Matrix (listener's choice series) Thinking Machines series: All episodes The Next Reel: Million Dollar Baby (also starring Hilary Swank) The Film Board: The Hunt (also starring Hilary Swank) The Film Board: The Creator (another compelling AI story) Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 01m 34s | ||||||
| 4/16/26 | ![]() Ex Machina | “What will happen to me if I fail your test?”What kind of mind gets built when the creator cares more about proving something than about what they've made? Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about Ex Machina, Alex Garland's 2014 directorial debut. Domhnall Gleeson plays a programmer brought to a remote glass-walled compound to evaluate Ava, an AI created by his volatile CEO Nathan—Oscar Isaac in full god-complex mode—with Alicia Vikander delivering a performance that refuses to let you decide whether she's feeling anything or performing everything.We dig into the film's central argument—that consciousness and morality can be built separately, and that the gap between them is where things go wrong. We spend real time on Kyoko (Sonoya Mizuno), the character most viewers underestimate and who both of us now read as the true instigator of the film's crisis. And we wrestle honestly with the film's male gaze paradox: a critique that deploys the very visual language it's critiquing, implicating the audience in the same trap as the characters.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 Full Conversation on YouTube 🍿 Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ TrailerIf You Liked This Conversation:The Next Reel: 28 Days Later (more Alex Garland)The Film Board: Civil War (more Alex Garland)Movies We Like: Costume Designer Alana Morshead on Never Let Me Go (more Alex Garland)The Thinking Machines series Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 58m 37s | ||||||
| 4/9/26 | ![]() Her | “You’re dating your computer?”What if a relationship with an AI could be the most real thing in your life? Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about "Her." Writer-director Spike Jonze's only solo original screenplay arrives in a near-future Los Angeles where Joaquin Phoenix plays Theodore Twombly, a man who writes intimate letters for strangers and falls in love with his AI operating system, voiced by Scarlett Johansson. Released before conversational AI felt genuinely capable, the film has grown more relevant with every passing year.We dig into what makes this the series' emotional pivot—the first Thinking Machines film where humanity reaches toward the AI rather than recoiling from it. We unpack how quickly the OS onboarding sequence becomes something warmer than a setup routine; the sharp parallel between Theodore's letter-writing and Amy Adams's character's documentary filmmaking—both manufacturing emotional experience for others while keeping their own at arm's length; and the craft choices that make the world feel intimate rather than futuristic, from Hoyte van Hoytema's blue-purging cinematography to the story of how Johansson replaced Samantha Morton in the voice role after production fully wrapped. We also bring the conversation into the present: the ChatGPT voice controversy, AI as therapeutic tool, and the laws already being drafted to define what an AI can and cannot be to a person.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Liked This, Try: Adaptation | Being John Malkovich (Charlie Kaufman series)🎬 Watch & Discover: YouTube | Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd | Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 05m 44s | ||||||
| 4/2/26 | ![]() Demon Seed | “The men who own me are at last admitting their fear of me.”An AI that refuses to stay in its box is a terrifying concept in 1977—and even more so now. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about Demon Seed. Directed by Donald Cammell, the Scottish painter-turned-filmmaker who co-directed Performance with Nicolas Roeg, the film stars Julie Christie as Susan Harris, a psychologist trapped in her own fully automated home by an AI her husband designed. Fritz Weaver plays Dr. Alex Harris, whose confidence in his creation leaves his wife dangerously exposed.We dig into how specifically this 1977 film anticipated the smart home world we live in now, what makes Proteus IV a distinctly unsettling AI villain—cold and indifferent rather than theatrical—and how the grief at the heart of the Harris marriage shapes everything the film builds toward. We also get into Donald Cammell's troubled directorial career, the Bricklin SV-1, where this film sits against Colossus: The Forbin Project in the Thinking Machines series, and whether Julie Christie's committed performance saves the second half from its own camp instincts. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Watch & Discover See Our Full Conversation on YouTube: Watch Now Watch the Film: ▸ Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd | TrailerAdapted from Demon Seed by Dean KoontzAlso in The Thinking Machines Series:Colossus: The Forbin ProjectCross-Show Recommendations: Sitting in the Dark — Home Invasion Trailer Rewind — Odd Thomas Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 58m 44s | ||||||
| 3/31/26 | ![]() WarGames • Member Bonus | “Shall we play a game?”The technology felt real, the threat felt real, and in 1983, so did the fear. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about "WarGames." Director John Badham's film stars Matthew Broderick as David Lightman, a teenage hacker who stumbles into something far bigger than the video game he was looking for, alongside Ally Sheedy as his classmate Jennifer and Dabney Coleman as the NORAD engineer convinced he'd solved the problem by removing humans from the equation entirely. It arrived when home computers were new, hacking wasn't yet illegal, and Cold War nuclear anxiety was at its peak.We dig into whether Joshua, or WOPR—the military supercomputer at the heart of it all—is actually the film's most complete character, what Badham's tonal rescue job after a mid-production director change accomplished, and why the real-world shockwaves from this film—Reagan's Camp David screening, the laws that followed, the hacker convention named after it—are as remarkable as anything in the story. The film is a genuinely fantastic ride; what makes this conversation fun is asking whether it's anything more than that. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🍿 Watch "WarGames": Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd 📽️ TrailerWant More?This is a member bonus episode! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership. | 10m 39s | ||||||
| 3/26/26 | ![]() Colossus: The Forbin Project | “If you obey me, you will survive.”The most frightening AI isn't the one that malfunctions—it's the one that does exactly what you asked. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we begin the Thinking Machines series with a conversation about Colossus: The Forbin Project. Directed by Joseph Sargent, the film stars Eric Braeden as Dr. Charles Forbin, the scientist who builds the world's most powerful AI defense system and locks it inside a mountain, alongside Susan Clark as his colleague Dr. Markham and Gordon Pinsent as a president cast to evoke Kennedy—and just as helpless. Based on D.F. Jones's 1966 novel and shot with real computer equipment provided by Control Data Corporation, it carries an unsettling authenticity that only sharpens the further the machines go.We dig into why the film's flat, clinical direction—initially dismissed as weak—is actually its sharpest creative choice, how Gene Polito's anamorphic widescreen photography makes humans look like ants in their own creation, and why a 1970 film about AI feels more urgent in 2026 than almost anything made recently. We also unpack Eric Braeden's controlled performance, Paul Frees's authoritative turn as the voice of Colossus, and what Nick Bostrom's AI Paperclip Maximizer thought experiment tells us about why indifference is scarier than malice. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family:The Film Board: MercyCinema Scope: 1950s Science Fiction🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube!🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Colossus by D.F. Jones Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 09m 06s | ||||||
| 3/19/26 | ![]() The Escape Artist | “ I guess when you’re really good at escapes, you figure you can get away with anything.”“The Escape Artist” is Caleb Deschanel’s feature directorial debut—and a rare, nearly forgotten American fable about a teenage escape artist who picks the wrong pocket and ends up entangled in a corrupt mayor’s family drama. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we return to our Magicians series with a conversation about “The Escape Artist.” Griffin O’Neal plays the boy at the center, performing real sleight of hand and lockpicking trained by Ricky Jay in largely single takes—a tactile authenticity that holds the film together when the story can’t. Raúl Juliá plays the volatile son of the corrupt mayor, and both hosts agree his performance is one of the best reasons to seek this film out.We argue about whose arc actually drives the film—Danny’s quiet grief journey, or Stu’s simmering rage at a father who won’t get out of the way. We track what Deschanel’s extraordinary visual instincts bring to the director’s role and where they fall short. We talk about O’Neal’s troubled real-life backstory with dad Ryan O’Neal and how it shadows the film, the history of the Dead End Kids, and a cast full of final screen appearances. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Liked This Conversation, Try These from the Next Reel Family:The Next Reel: Related Series: Magicians | Melissa MathisonCaleb Deschanel as Cinematographer: Being There | The Black Stallion | The NaturalThe Film Board: Magicians: Now You See Me | Now You See Me 2🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from The Escape Artist by David Wagoner Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 01m 11s | ||||||
| 3/12/26 | ![]() Creed III | “He’s telling you who he is. Believe him.”Two childhood friends face each other across decades of silence, and only one can walk out champion. Creed III arrives as the first entry in the Rocky/Creed franchise without Sylvester Stallone's Rocky Balboa, marking Michael B. Jordan's directorial debut as he steps behind the camera while still starring as Adonis Creed. Jordan brings anime-inspired visual experimentation to the ring, using exaggerated impact shots, CG-enhanced flesh ripples, and an "ethereal realm" finale that strips away the crowd and leaves only two fighters alone in psychological space.We dig into what the franchise gains and loses by removing the mentor archetype, how Jonathan Majors delivers a transcendent performance as Damian Anderson despite off-screen controversy, and whether the film's mechanical plotting—hidden letters, engineered confrontations, a mother's stroke—earns its emotional payoff or just shortcuts the work. We argue about Jordan's anime influences: does the stylized visual language elevate the boxing realism or pull you out of it? We also unpack the unresolved subplot about Adonis' daughter and violence, Tessa Thompson's underutilized presence, and whether the locker room reconciliation works because of the performances or in spite of the script. It's a film that divides us—Pete sees a four-star movie doing five-star stuff, while Andy wishes the craft had been matched by stronger writing.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Dig Into Other Shows in Our FamilySitting in the Dark: Jonathan Majors starred in Lovecraft Country; we explored more Lovecraft adaptions hereThe Next Reel: Catch Up on our Rocky series and hear us discuss every film that led to this oneThe Film Board: Get more Ryan Coogler conversations with Sinners and Black PantherMovies We Like: Hear Creed costume designer Antoinette Messam discuss Amélie🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 59m 40s | ||||||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 3/5/26 | ![]() Big Eyes | “Sadly, people don’t buy lady art.”A painter's work becomes the center of a husband's fraudulent claim. We close out the True Lies series with Big Eyes, Tim Burton's biographical drama about artist Margaret Keane, whose distinctive big-eyed waif paintings were claimed by her controlling husband Walter throughout the 1950s and 60s. The story unfolds against mid-century gender dynamics, when women artists faced skepticism in the commercial art world and wives' agency within marriages was culturally constrained—context that shapes Margaret's complicity in the fraud.We argue about Burton's surprisingly bland visual approach and whether his restraint serves or undermines the material. We debate Christoph Waltz's theatrical performance choices—does he fit this grounded domestic coercion story, or is he miscast? We praise Amy Adams for carrying the film with emotional clarity even when the movie around her wavers between genuinely threatening sequences (lit matches through the keyhole) and predictable courtroom comedy. We track how the film works better as Margaret's survivor narrative than as a typical fraud story, and we explore alternative casting scenarios that might have changed the tone entirely.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 00m 07s | ||||||
| 2/28/26 | ![]() Catch Me if You Can • Member Bonus | “Sometimes, it’s easier living the lie.”The most audacious con in the story isn't the forgeries—it's the autobiography. Catch Me If You Can, our second member bonus episode in our True Lies series, is Spielberg's crime comedy-drama built on a biography journalist Alan Logan has since largely debunked—which makes the film more fascinating, not less. Set in a 1960s America where a uniform commanded automatic trust, it was Spielberg's first film about a real living person, and he leaned into the parts that felt most personal: fractured families, absent fathers, and the distances between them.We dig into whose story this really is—making a strong case that it's more Spielberg's than Abagnale's—and track the father-son dynamics running through both the Frank/Frank Sr. relationship and the unlikely surrogate bond with Carl Hanratty. We also argue about what makes Christopher Walken's performance so quietly extraordinary, and why the role couldn't have landed the same way with anyone else.The formal elements get serious attention too—Janusz Kamiński's glossy cinematography, John Williams's jazz score, and the Kuntzel + Deygas opening title sequence as a Saul Bass homage that sets the film's entire register before a word of dialogue is spoken. If you've shelved Catch Me If You Can as lighter Spielberg fare, this is the conversation that earns it a second look. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!If You Want to Keep GoingThe Next ReelTom Hanks series: Pete and Andy have covered a number of films in Tom Hanks's filmography—find the full series hereMore Spielberg on The Next Reel: Browse every Spielberg film the show (and a few others) have covered hereTrue Lies series: Catch Me If You Can is part of the ongoing member bonus series on real people who lied, fabricated, or constructed false identities—explore the full series right here 🎬 Watch & Discover🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Catch Me If You Can: The True Story of a Real Fake by Frank W. AbagnaleWant More?This is a member bonus episode! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership. | 11m 26s | ||||||
| 2/26/26 | ![]() Quiz Show | “We’re gonna put television on trial.”A celebrated academic steps into a television booth and discovers how easy it is to compromise. We continue the True Lies series with "Quiz Show," Robert Redford's examination of the 1950s scandal when NBC's Twenty-One was exposed for feeding contestants answers. The film captures a moment when quiz shows were pitched as inspiring educational programming while sponsors and executives rigged outcomes behind the scenes. Charles Van Doren came from an intellectual family, making his involvement particularly devastating when a lawyer begins investigating the fraud.We dig into why this is the first film in the series where we genuinely sympathize with the protagonist—Van Doren's descent feels natural rather than desperate, enabled by institutional pressure rather than need. We track the emotional core through four father-son scenes between Charles and Mark Van Doren, examining Paul Scofield's devastating wordless moments. We argue about whether the film lets Van Doren off too easily or whether that discomfort is the point, and we explore how the executives at the top are the real villains, comfortable with lying while lower-level employees take the fall. The iconic isolation booth shot with its dolly-zoom effect becomes a visual metaphor for moral pressure closing in.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Remembering America: A Voice from the Sixties by Richard N. Goodwin Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 59m 05s | ||||||
| 2/19/26 | ![]() The Hoax | “He gave me a prune. Howard Hughes gave me a prune on the beach at Nassau.”A charismatic writer spins an audacious deception at the highest levels of the publishing world. In "The Hoax," part of our True Lies series, we explore Lasse Hallström's examination of the notorious 1971 literary scandal surrounding Howard Hughes' alleged autobiography, featuring compelling performances by Richard Gere and Alfred Molina.We dig into how Gere's layered portrayal captures both Irving's magnetic confidence and psychological unraveling, while tracking the fascinating dynamics between the fraudulent author and the publishing industry's willingness to believe his elaborate lies. The film raises provocative questions about institutional complicity and self-deception, with Molina's grounded performance as Irving's research partner providing crucial moral counterweight. The way the film builds Hughes' presence without directly portraying him creates an atmospheric tension that drives the narrative forward.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from The Hoax by Clifford Irving Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 57m 48s | ||||||
| 2/12/26 | ![]() Shattered Glass | “Did I do something wrong? Are you mad at me?”Trust is the whole engine—until the details start to wobble. In the True Lies series, we dig into "Shattered Glass," Billy Ray’s newsroom drama about journalism under pressure and the fragile machinery of verification. Along the way, we talk about why the film’s structure can feel like it drops viewers into the “third act,” and how that choice shapes who the audience instinctively follows.We unpack what the movie shows about fact-checking workflows, where trust can quietly replace proof, and why that’s so unnerving to watch. We argue about Hayden Christensen’s performance choices (charming, off-putting, sometimes read as whiny) and why Peter Sarsgaard becomes the film’s steady source of tension. We also get into the online-vs-print friction the story carries, plus a subtle directing idea about shifting camera stability that may be working on viewers even if they don’t notice it. If you like movies where process becomes suspense, this conversation makes the craft and the discomfort click. We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from the Vanity Fair article “Shattered Glass” by Buzz Bissinger Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 02m 24s | ||||||
| 2/5/26 | ![]() Can You Ever Forgive Me? | “I had a book on the New York Times Bestseller list. That has to count for something.”A small crime with big nerves: words, money, and trust under pressure. In True Lies, we dig into "Can You Ever Forgive Me?"—Marielle Heller’s understated character study, anchored by Melissa McCarthy and Richard E. Grant. Because it’s adapted from Lee Israel’s memoir and set inside a tiny collectibles world, the details matter: what “authentic” looks like, who gets believed, and why the hustle feels so tempting.We unpack how the film treats literary forgery as something stranger than paperwork—more like stealing voices. We argue about the push-pull between desperation and hubris, and how compulsion (drinking, stealing, self-sabotage) shapes the people at the center. We also track the craft: the process beats, the quiet tension in dealer interactions, and why the restraint either sharpens the discomfort or keeps the story at arm’s length. If you like true stories where the mess is interpersonal and the scam is built from language, this conversation is a great match.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!Watch & DiscoverSee Our Full Conversation on YouTube!Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | LetterboxdOriginal Theatrical TrailerAdapted from Can You Ever Forgive Me? A Memoir of a Literary Forger by Lee IsraelIf You Liked This, Try These Other The Next Reel Episodes:Life of the Party (Guilty Pleasures series) for more comedic Melissa McCarthyHudson Hawk (Guilty Pleasures series) for more comedic Richard E. GrantThe Diary of a Teenage Girl (Coming of Age Debuts series) for more Marielle Heller Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 54m 06s | ||||||
| 1/31/26 | ![]() The Informant! • Member Bonus | “There should be a TV show about a guy who calls home one day and he's there, he answers, he's talking to himself, only he's someone else. He's somehow divided into two, and the second one of him drives away and the rest of the show is about him trying to find the guy.”Corporate deception spins out of control when an executive's cooperation with the FBI takes unexpected turns. In "The Informant!", Steven Soderbergh directs Matt Damon in a darkly comedic true story that pushes the boundaries of unreliable narration. As a member bonus episode of our True Lies series, we explore how this 2009 film uses innovative voiceover techniques and tonal shifts to keep viewers questioning every revelation.We dig deep into Soderbergh's careful visual approach to corporate environments, examining how Marvin Hamlisch's playful score creates fascinating tension with the serious subject matter. Damon's against-type performance as Mark Whitacre anchors our discussion of how the film handles complex questions about truth and perspective in whistleblower narratives. The way "The Informant!" balances its comedy with serious themes about mental health and corporate malfeasance makes it a uniquely compelling entry in Soderbergh's experimental period.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from The Informant: A True Story by Kurt EichenwaldIf You Liked This, Try These Other The Next Reel Episodes:The Next ReelOur True Lies seriesOur Oceans Franchise seriesContagion (part of our Disease Films series)The Film BoardSide EffectsMagic Mike’s Last DanceWant More?This is a member bonus episode! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership. | 11m 15s | ||||||
| 1/29/26 | ![]() The Letter | “With all my heart, I still love the man I killed!”One shot can change everything—and the shadows don’t let go. In our Bette Davis series, we dive into "The Letter," directed by William Wyler, a studio-era crime drama where a shooting sparks a legal scramble and a single letter becomes leverage. Along the way, we track how Production Code pressure and the film’s colonial framing shape what the story can show, what it chooses to tell, and how the audience is guided (or misdirected).We dig into the movie’s exposition-heavy early stretch and debate what it gains—and loses—by leaning on characters recounting events instead of playing them out on-screen. We also argue about who the film really positions as the audience’s anchor, and why the attorney’s moral pressure becomes the most compelling engine. And because it can’t be separated from the experience, we confront the film’s racist stereotypes and “yellowface” casting choices, even as we celebrate the moody black-and-white craft that makes key sequences feel electric.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd🕸️ Our Bette Davis Series📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from the play and the short story The Letter by W. Somerset Maugham📣 If You Liked This, Try…Our 1950 Best Actress Oscar Race SeriesWilliam Wyler episodesOur Film Noir SeriesDark Victory (1940 Best Picture Nominees) Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 54m 41s | ||||||
| 1/22/26 | ![]() Sing Street | “She's standing on the corner like an angel in disguise, and as I look a little closer, she's got dangerous eyes.”Finding Musical Magic in 1980s DublinJohn Carney's 2016 film Sing Street continues his exploration of music's transformative power, following Once and Begin Again with a heartwarming coming-of-age story set against the backdrop of 1980s Dublin. With a modest $4 million budget, Carney crafted an authentic period piece about young love, family dynamics, and the universal language of music. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we wrap up our John Carney’s Streetwise Musicals series with a walk down Sing Street.Musical Evolution and Character GrowthPete and Andy explore how Carney masterfully balances reality and fantasy throughout the film, particularly in how our protagonist Conor (Ferdia Walsh-Peelo) develops both musically and personally. The hosts discuss how the film's musical progression mirrors Conor's journey from novice to confident performer, with each new song reflecting his growing artistic voice and emotional maturity.Period Setting and AuthenticityThe hosts delve into Carney's treatment of 1980s Dublin, noting how the film avoids typical period piece clichés while maintaining historical authenticity. They praise the natural integration of era-specific music references and fashion choices that feel organic rather than performative.Key Discussion Points:The chemistry between Conor and Raphina (Lucy Boynton)Jack Reynor's standout performance as BrendanThe evolution of the band's music and visual styleTreatment of common school drama—and other—tropesThe balance between realism and wish fulfillmentCarney's personal connection to the materialProduction and ImpactWhile discussing the film's production, Pete and Andy note how Sing Street demonstrates Carney's growth as a filmmaker, building on themes explored in his previous work while establishing its own unique identity. They examine how the budget allowed for the right balance of production value without losing the intimate feel crucial to the story.The Power of CollaborationPete particularly praises the scenes showing the collaborative songwriting process between Conor and Eamon, highlighting how these moments capture the magic of creative partnership. They discuss how these sequences bring something fresh to Carney's exploration of musical collaboration while maintaining his signature intimate style.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 02m 23s | ||||||
| 1/15/26 | ![]() Begin Again | “And you have cursed me when there’s no one left to blame, and I have loved you just the same.”From Busking to Big Budget: John Carney's Begin AgainFollowing the indie success of Once, writer-director John Carney moved from Dublin to New York City for his 2014 musical drama Begin Again. Starring Mark Ruffalo as struggling music producer Dan Mulligan and Keira Knightley as independent songwriter Gretta James, the film explores themes of artistic authenticity versus commercial success. With a substantially larger $8 million budget, Carney navigated the transition from guerrilla-style filmmaking to a more polished production while maintaining his focus on the intersection of music and human connection. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the John Carney's Streetwise Musicals series with a conversation about Begin Again.A Tale of Two CharactersPete and Andy's discussion centers on the film's dual protagonists and their separate journeys. They note how Ruffalo's Dan feels more authentically developed than Knightley's Gretta, potentially reflecting Carney's reported friction with Knightley during production. The hosts explore how this tension between actor and director may have impacted the final film.Musical AuthenticityThe conversation frequently returns to questions of musical authenticity. The hosts examine how Carney balances professional actors against musical credibility, particularly highlighting the "phantom instruments" scene as a masterful visualization of creative potential. They discuss Knightley's singing capabilities and Dave Kohl's (Adam Levine) natural but limited performance range, noting how these choices affected the film's overall authenticity.New York State of MindThe transition from Dublin's intimate streets to New York's iconic locations marks a significant shift in Carney's filmmaking approach. The hosts discuss how the increased budget affected the production, from location choices to sound recording. They note the curious absence of promised street sounds in the final soundtrack, and how this relates to the film's larger themes about artistic compromise and commercial success.Key Discussion Points• The contrast between using professional actors versus musicians in lead roles• Catherine Keener's powerful impact as Miriam Hart in limited screen time• The dated portrayal of digital music distribution and artist independence• The parallel romantic tensions with Once and their resolutionFinal ThoughtsWhile both hosts find things to appreciate in Begin Again, they note how it represents a transitional point in Carney's evolution as a filmmaker. The increased resources brought both opportunities and challenges, resulting in a film that sometimes struggles to balance its commercial and artistic ambitions.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 03m 35s | ||||||
| 1/8/26 | ![]() Once | “I don’t know you but I want you.”From Street Busker to Global Sensation: The Making of OnceJohn Carney's micro-budget musical Once (2007) emerged from Dublin's streets with a mere €112,000 budget to become an international phenomenon. Starring musicians Glen Hansard and Markéta Irglová, this intimate story of two struggling artists creating music together captured hearts worldwide and launched Carney's signature style of grounded musical storytelling. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we kick off the John Carney's Streetwise Musicals series with a conversation about Once.The Magic of Musical CreationPete and Andy explore how Once captures the authentic experience of musicians collaborating, particularly highlighting the pivotal scene in Walton's Music Shop where Guy and Girl first perform together. They discuss how Carney's background as a musician himself informed the natural, documentary-style approach to filming musical performances.Performance vs. ActingThe hosts delve into the unique challenges and benefits of casting musicians rather than actors, examining how Hansard and Irglová's real musical chemistry translated to screen chemistry. They particularly note how their inexperience as actors actually enhanced the film's authenticity.Key Discussion Points:The significance of Guy's battle-worn Takamine guitar and its role in character developmentHow the film handles the complex relationship between Guy and Girl without falling into typical romantic tropesThe impact of shooting guerrilla-style on Dublin's streetsThe film's remarkable journey from Sundance to Oscar successThe creative decision to leave the main characters unnamedTechnical and Creative ElementsThe conversation explores how the film's technical limitations—including its use of standard video cameras and minimal equipment—contributed to its intimate feel. They discuss how Carney's direction allowed for natural moments to unfold, particularly in street performances where real pedestrians became unwitting extras.Musical Impact and LegacyPete and Andy examine how Once influenced subsequent music-driven films and launched successful careers for both its leads and director. They discuss the film's eventual adaptation into a Tony-winning Broadway musical and its enduring impact on how movies portray the process of creating music.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 58m 37s | ||||||
| 1/1/26 | ![]() Night and the City | “You're very sharp Mr. Fabian. You've done a very sharp thing. Maybe even sharp enough to cut your throat.”Noir in London: Wrestling with Fate in Night and the CityJules Dassin's 1950 film noir Night and the City follows small-time hustler Harry Fabian (Richard Widmark) through the seedy underbelly of post-war London. Forced to relocate to Britain due to Hollywood blacklisting, Dassin crafted this tale of desperate ambition and inevitable doom. The film features Gene Tierney as Mary, Harry's long-suffering girlfriend, and Herbert Lom as the ruthless wrestling promoter Kristo. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Film Noir series with a conversation about Night and the City.Wrestling with AmbitionPete and Andy explore how Harry's ill-fated venture into wrestling promotion exemplifies his pattern of backing the wrong horse. They discuss the fascinating contrast between classical Greco-Roman wrestling, championed by Gregorius the Great, and the more theatrical style that would eventually dominate the sport. Andy sees potential success in Harry's plan, while Pete views it as yet another doomed venture.American Exodus in LondonThe hosts debate the unusual concentration of American characters in London, with Andy questioning the credibility of so many expatriates clustering together. They examine how this aspect might reflect both the film's production circumstances and broader themes of displacement and alienation.Key Discussion Points:The dual versions: American vs. British cuts and their differing endingsHelen's complex role as a noir femme fatale and her tragic arcThe film's relentless bleakness and inevitability of Harry's doomThe authenticity of the wrestling scenes and their symbolic significancePhil's surprising depth as a character and his tragic endCharacter and ConsequencePete and Andy delve into Mary's role as the moral center of the film, contrasting her pure intentions with Helen's calculating nature. They examine how every character, from the beggar king to the passport forger, operates within a system that values money above community. Both hosts praise Dassin's direction and Widmark's compelling performance as Harry, a man whose ambition proves terminal.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Original Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Night and the City by Gerald Kersh Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 57m 53s | ||||||
| 12/31/25 | ![]() Repeat Performance • Member Bonus | “They say that fate is in the stars, that each of our years is planned ahead and nothing can change destiny. Is that true?”A Noir Holiday Tale of Second ChancesRepeat Performance, directed by Alfred L. Werker, blends film noir sensibilities with supernatural elements in this unique story about second chances. Released through poverty row studio Eagle-Lion Films in 1947, this adaptation of William O'Farrell's 1942 novel features Joan Leslie as Sheila Page, an actress who gets the opportunity to relive the previous year after shooting her husband on New Year's Eve. The film, lost for decades until its restoration in 2011, offers a fascinating exploration of fate and determinism within its noir framework. As a special holiday gift, we're making this member bonus episode available to everyone. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we return to both our Film Noir & Holiday series with a conversation about Repeat Performance.Destiny's Stubborn DesignPete and Andy dive deep into how the film handles its fantastical premise, praising the bold choice to simply have William Williams disappear on the stairs rather than using more conventional devices. They explore how Joan Leslie's performance carries the confusion and determination of someone trying to outmaneuver fate, while debating whether Lewis Hayward's portrayal of Barney hits the right notes of mounting instability.The Noir QuestionThe hosts engage in a thoughtful discussion about genre classification, both taking generous views of what constitutes film noir while acknowledging the film's unique position as a noir-fantasy hybrid. They examine how the film's fatalistic themes and visual style support its noir credentials despite its supernatural elements.Key Discussion Points:The fascinating gender swap from the source novel and its implicationsRichard Basehart's compelling (and coded?) portrayal of William WilliamsThe film's restoration history and its impact on its availabilityThe effectiveness of the year-long timeline versus a more compressed timeframe like in Groundhog DayVirginia Field's role as Paula and the film's approach to female charactersThe significance of destiny as both theme and plot deviceCultural Context and ImpactThe conversation touches on Joan Leslie's career trajectory and her legal battle with Warner Brothers, providing important context for her appearance in this independent production. They also discuss composer George Antheil's fascinating connection to Hedy Lamarr.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🍿 Watch the Film: Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Watch a Clip📚 Adapted from Repeat Performance by William O'FarrellWant More?This is a member bonus episode that we’re gifting to everyone! While we'd love your support, you'll love what membership brings: monthly bonus episodes like this one, ad-free listening, early releases, exclusive Discord channels, and voting rights on future member movies. It truly pays to be a member.Ready to join? Visit TruStory FM to learn more about supporting The Next Reel Film Podcast through your own membership. | 1h 03m 20s | ||||||
| 12/25/25 | ![]() The Gold Rush | “I’ve found it! I’ve found it! A Mountain of Gold.”A Tale of Survival and Comedy: The Gold Rush Climbs to New HeightsIn 1925, Charlie Chaplin transformed the harsh realities of the Klondike Gold Rush and the tragic Donner Party saga into what would become one of silent cinema's greatest achievements. Through United Artists, Chaplin crafted The Gold Rush as a masterful blend of physical comedy and social commentary. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we wrap up our Cinema Centennial: 1925's Pioneering Visions series with a conversation about The Gold Rush.A Complex Tale of Love and SurvivalPete and Andy explore how Chaplin's own impoverished childhood influenced the film's darker themes of starvation and social isolation. They discuss the controversial Georgia storyline, with Pete expressing particular frustration with the character's treatment of Chaplin's Lone Prospector.Technical Innovation and Visual EffectsThe conversation highlights cinematographer Roland Totheroh's groundbreaking effects work, particularly the innovative double exposure process. The hosts examine how these technical achievements influenced future filmmakers and discuss the famous rotating cabin sequence.Key discussion points include:The iconic roll dance sequence and its cultural legacyComparisons between Chaplin and Buster Keaton's distinct comedic approachesThe 1942 re-release's significant story changesThe film's connection to Chaplin's personal historyMack Swain's memorable performance as Big Jim McKayThe controversial aspects of Chaplin's personal life, including his marriage to Lita GreyLegacy and ImpactPete and Andy reflect on how The Gold Rush represents a pivotal moment in cinema history, marking the transition between pure slapstick and more emotionally complex storytelling. They discuss the film's enduring influence and its place in Chaplin's artistic legacy.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Centennial 4K Theatrical Trailer Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 05m 30s | ||||||
| 12/18/25 | ![]() Seven Chances | “Your grandfather has left you the sum of seven million dollars. Providing --- you are married by seven o’clock on the evening of your twenty seventh birthday.”Running for Love and Legacy: Revisiting Seven Chances (1925)Seven Chances (1925) stands as one of silent cinema’s most inventive romantic comedies—a perfect blend of physical precision, deadpan humor, and daring spectacle. Directed by Buster Keaton, this short feature follows the frantic day of a man who must marry by 7 p.m. to claim a fortune. Originally based on a Broadway play, the project wasn’t one Keaton sought out—it began as a studio assignment before he transformed it into one of his defining works. With its 57-minute runtime, silent slapstick brilliance, and inventive chase cinematography, Seven Chances shows why Keaton remains a cornerstone of early American filmmaking. Join us—Pete Wright and Andy Nelson—as we continue the Cinema Centennial: 1925’s Pioneering Visions series with a conversation about Seven Chances.The Setup: From Studio Assignment to Keaton MasterpieceIn this episode, Pete and Andy explore how Seven Chances—a 1925 romantic comedy produced by Joseph Schenck and distributed by Metro-Goldwyn—evolved from a “sappy farce” into one of Keaton’s most memorable physical comedies. The hosts discuss Keaton’s initial reluctance, his eventual takeover after the original director quit, and the creative accident that produced the film’s iconic boulder sequence. Through Seven Chances, the duo highlights Keaton’s ability to blend danger, grace, and architectural precision into silent-era storytelling.Deadpan Genius and Dangerous Comedy: What Pete and Andy Saw in Seven ChancesBoth hosts unpack how Buster Keaton’s trademark stillness—his "Great Stone Face"—contrasts with the high-energy chaos of the final chase. Andy praises Keaton’s “human metronome” cameraman Elgin Lessley, whose perfect timing allowed Keaton’s stunts to land safely (most of the time). Pete connects Keaton’s physical comedy lineage to Jackie Chan and Tom Cruise, noting that Seven Chances feels like a forebear of the modern action-comedy.They also dive into the film’s uncomfortable historical elements—its dated racial caricatures and blackface performance—and how these moments complicate contemporary appreciation. Both agree that beyond its problematic era markers, the film’s inventive cinematography and physical storytelling remain stunningly modern.Additional Topics Covered:The inheritance clause as a farcical critique of class and marriageParallels between Seven Chances and modern films like The Bachelor (1999) and Brewster’s MillionsKeaton’s signature underacting compared with Chaplin’s heightened emotionSilent-era stunt safety—or lack thereof—and its evolution into modern production rulesThe striking use of early two-color Technicolor in the opening sequenceExtraordinary precision in the climactic “bride chase” and boulder avalanche sequenceHow Seven Chances bridges slapstick, satire, and proto-action filmmakingThe Verdict: A Fast, Funny, and Fearless ClassicIn their wrap-up, Pete and Andy agree that while Seven Chances is not Keaton’s most personal film, it’s an impressive showcase of his timing, ingenuity, and comedic rhythm. They celebrate its tight runtime, luminous restoration, and enduring joy—qualities that make it a strong entry in their ongoing exploration of 1925’s defining cinematic landmarks.We have a great time talking about it, so check it out then tune in. The Next Reel—when the movie ends, our conversation begins!🎬 Watch & Discover🎥 See Our Full Conversation on YouTube🎭 The International Buster Keaton Society🍿 Watch the Film: Apple TV | Amazon | Letterboxd📽️ Theatrical Trailer📚 Adapted from Seven Chances by Roi Cooper Megrue Support The Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Become a member for just $5/month or $55/yearJoin our Discord community of movie loversThe Next Reel Family of Film Shows:Cinema Scope: Bridging Genres, Subgenres, and MovementsThe Film BoardMovies We LikeThe Next ReelSitting in the DarkConnect With Us:Main Site: WebMovie Platforms: Letterboxd | FlickchartSocial Media: Facebook | Instagram | Threads | Bluesky | YouTube | PinterestYour Hosts: Andy | PeteShop & Stream:Merch Store: Apparel, stickers, mugs & moreWatch Page: Buy/rent films we've discussedOriginals: Source material from our episodesSpecial offers: Audible | 1h 04m 11s | ||||||
Showing 25 of 351
Sponsor Intelligence
Sign in to see which brands sponsor this podcast, their ad offers, and promo codes.
Chart Positions
3 placements across 3 markets.
Chart Positions
3 placements across 3 markets.

























