The Niall Boylan Podcast (They Told Me To Shut Up)

TDs and Senators from across the political spectrum have recommended one of the biggest changes to Ireland's drug laws in decades, calling for the possession of all illegal drugs for personal use to be fully decriminalised. The recommendation, contained in the final report of the Oireachtas Committee on Drugs Use, follows similar proposals made by the Citizens' Assembly on Drug Use and argues that addiction should be treated primarily as a health issue rather than a criminal justice issue. The report also recommends expanding harm reduction services and moving Ireland further towards a health-led approach. In the past two days, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has confirmed the Government will give the recommendations "serious consideration", while supporters including committee chair Gary Gannon and the Social Democrats say the current system has failed and that criminalising addiction only pushes vulnerable people further from treatment.On today's podcast, Niall is joined by Aontú leader Peadar Tóibín and Cllr Gavin Peppper, who strongly opposes the proposals. Tóibín argues that decriminalising possession of drugs such as cocaine and heroin would normalise drug use, weaken deterrence, and send the wrong message to young people at a time when Ireland is already facing a growing drugs crisis. He believes addiction should be treated compassionately, but insists that removing criminal sanctions would ultimately make the problem worse rather than better.Is it time to accept that the war on drugs has failed and treat addiction as a public health issue? Or would decriminalising all drugs simply encourage more drug use and leave communities paying the price? Niall hears from Peadar Tóibín before opening the phone lines to ask listeners: Should Ireland decriminalise the possession of all drugs for personal use, or would it be a dangerous mistake?

Ireland's long-awaited Covid inquiry is finally underway, and already it is raising difficult questions. This week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin faced extensive questioning from the inquiry panel about the Government's handling of the pandemic, but unlike the public inquiries seen in the UK and elsewhere, the interviews are being conducted behind closed doors. No transcripts will be published and the inquiry team has repeatedly stated that its role is not to "point fingers" or assign blame.On today's programme, Niall is joined by callers to the show discuss whether that approach goes far enough. After years of lockdowns, vaccine mandates, business closures, travel restrictions and unprecedented limits on personal freedoms, should the inquiry focus on identifying mistakes and holding decision-makers accountable? Or is the real purpose of the inquiry to learn lessons and ensure Ireland is better prepared for the next pandemic?Niall and Karl examine some of the most controversial aspects of Ireland's Covid response, including restrictions on businesses, school closures, nursing home policies, public health messaging and the economic impact of prolonged lockdowns. They also discuss whether a private inquiry can ever satisfy families, business owners and citizens who feel they deserve answers about decisions that affected every aspect of their lives.As always, Niall opens the phone lines to hear from listeners. Should the Covid inquiry be about accountability and responsibility, or would a blame game achieve nothing and simply distract from preparing for future crises?WhatsApp your thoughts to 085 100 22 55.

Ireland's long-awaited Covid inquiry is finally underway, and already it is raising difficult questions. This week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin faced extensive questioning from the inquiry panel about the Government's handling of the pandemic, but unlike the public inquiries seen in the UK and elsewhere, the interviews are being conducted behind closed doors. No transcripts will be published and the inquiry team has repeatedly stated that its role is not to "point fingers" or assign blame.On today's programme, Niall is joined by Karl Deeter discuss whether that approach goes far enough. After years of lockdowns, vaccine mandates, business closures, travel restrictions and unprecedented limits on personal freedoms, should the inquiry focus on identifying mistakes and holding decision-makers accountable? Or is the real purpose of the inquiry to learn lessons and ensure Ireland is better prepared for the next pandemic?Niall and Karl examine some of the most controversial aspects of Ireland's Covid response, including restrictions on businesses, school closures, nursing home policies, public health messaging and the economic impact of prolonged lockdowns. They also discuss whether a private inquiry can ever satisfy families, business owners and citizens who feel they deserve answers about decisions that affected every aspect of their lives.As always, Niall opens the phone lines to hear from listeners. Should the Covid inquiry be about accountability and responsibility, or would a blame game achieve nothing and simply distract from preparing for future crises?

On this episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall is joined by podcaster and commentator Elaine Mullally to discuss a growing trend among modern parents, tracking their children's every move through smartphone apps.With location-sharing technology now available at the touch of a button, many parents say it offers peace of mind and an extra layer of protection in an increasingly unpredictable world. They argue that knowing where your child is can help keep them safe from online predators, dangerous situations and emergencies.But critics warn that constant surveillance could be doing more harm than good. They say teenagers need freedom, trust and the opportunity to make their own decisions. Some psychologists have even suggested that excessive monitoring may damage parent-child relationships and prevent young people from developing independence and confidence.So where should the line be drawn? Do parents have a right to know where their children are at all times, especially when they're still living under their roof? Or is 24-hour phone tracking creating a generation that feels constantly watched and controlled?Niall and Elaine debate whether tracking apps are a sensible parenting tool or a step too far, before opening the phone lines to hear from listeners with strong opinions on both sides of the argument.Would you track your teenager's phone? Or would you see it as an invasion of privacy that risks destroying trust between parents and children?

Did Political Correctness Cost Baby Preston His Life?In this powerful and deeply emotional discussion, Niall speaks with journalist John McGuirk from The Statement about the shocking murder of 13 month old Preston Davey at the hands of his adoptive parents, Jamie Varley and John McGowan-Fazakerley.John examines the serious questions now being asked of British social services and child protection agencies after a catalogue of missed warning signs, including repeated hospital visits, unexplained injuries and concerns that appear to have been overlooked. The pair discuss whether authorities failed in their duty to protect Preston, and whether fears of appearing discriminatory may have influenced decision making when assessing the suitability of prospective adoptive parents.The conversation also explores wider concerns surrounding adoption, child safeguarding, institutional failures and whether difficult questions are being avoided because they involve sensitive social and political issues.Later in the discussion, Niall and John turn their attention to British politics and growing pressure on Prime Minister Keir Starmer. With criticism mounting over immigration, policing, public services and declining public confidence in government, they discuss why some political commentators are already speculating about Starmer's future and whether calls for his resignation are likely to grow in the months ahead.A challenging and thought provoking conversation about accountability, child protection and the state of modern Britain.

he Weekly Round-Up with Niall Boylan & AJ WalshThis week Niall is joined by his former producer and long-time friend AJ Walsh for a lively and no-holds-barred look back at the stories that got everyone talking.They discuss the horrific Preston Davey case and the questions being asked following the convictions. They also look at the growing debate around trust in the media as the BBC faces major cuts in an effort to save hundreds of millions of pounds, with programmes and jobs on the chopping block.The pair debate the Government's move to back the removal of Ireland's three-day abortion waiting period and ask whether it is a long overdue change or a step too far. They also examine the UK's plans to introduce tougher restrictions on social media access for young people and whether such measures are about protecting children or controlling online speech.Finally, they discuss the listener whose marriage is under strain after his wife adopted a vegan lifestyle and began encouraging their children to do the same. Is veganism a personal choice, or can it become a source of division within families?As always, Niall and AJ bring their own opinions, challenge each other, and take a look at the stories that sparked the biggest debates of the week.

On this episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall speaks to Councillor Gavin Pepper about one of the most divisive issues in Irish politics today, who should get priority for social housing when there simply aren't enough homes to go around.The discussion follows comments by Nigel Farage, who has pledged that under a Reform UK government, foreign nationals would be barred from accessing social housing and would instead be expected to secure private accommodation or potentially face deportation. Supporters say citizens should come first when housing is in short supply, while critics argue that anyone who is legally living, working and paying taxes deserves equal treatment.The debate has also reignited questions here in Ireland. While access to social housing is subject to strict eligibility rules, many people believe foreign nationals are being allocated homes ahead of Irish citizens who have spent years on waiting lists. Others insist this is a misconception and that housing is allocated based on need, family circumstances and legal entitlement rather than nationality.Niall asks Gavin Pepper whether foreign nationals are genuinely jumping the queue for social housing and, if so, how that is happening. Are loopholes in the system being exploited? Is the public being misled about who gets housing and why? Or are politicians avoiding an honest conversation about the pressures immigration is placing on an already overwhelmed housing system?The conversation also explores whether social housing should primarily be reserved for citizens and long-term taxpayers, or whether anyone who is legally resident in the country should have equal access to support. As housing shortages continue to worsen, who should come first when there simply aren't enough homes for everyone?Niall and Gavin debate the facts, the politics and the public anger surrounding one of the most controversial issues facing Ireland today.

On today's podcast, Niall discusses a message from a listener who says his wife's decision to become vegan has transformed their home life into a battleground. What began as a personal dietary choice has evolved into a major source of conflict, with the listener claiming his wife now refuses to buy animal products, wants their young children raised vegan and regularly criticises his own eating habits.Joining Niall is Cathal Leahy from PAWS, who argues that concerns about animal welfare, factory farming and environmental damage are legitimate reasons for people to change their lifestyles and encourage others to do the same. The discussion also hears from an animal rights activist who believes society has become too comfortable with the treatment of animals and that more people should question where their food comes from.But many callers strongly disagreed. Some argued that while adults are free to choose any diet they wish, imposing veganism on young children is unfair and potentially harmful if not carefully managed. Others said the real issue isn't veganism itself, but when any belief system becomes so dominant that it creates tension and division within a family.Should parents have the right to raise their children vegan? Is encouraging a plant based lifestyle a responsible moral choice, or are some activists so passionate about their cause that they end up alienating friends and family?The debate sparked passionate reactions from callers on both sides, making for a lively and thought provoking discussion.

On today's podcast, Niall Boylan is joined by Sunday Times economics columnist Cormac Lucey to discuss a growing crisis that goes far beyond politics and economics, the collapse of public trust in the media.New figures published in the Digital News Report Ireland 2026 show that trust in "most news" has fallen sharply in Ireland, dropping from 51% to 42% in just one year. According to the report, Ireland recorded one of the steepest declines in news trust of any country surveyed. While confidence in individual news brands has remained relatively stable, trust in the wider media landscape continues to erode.At the same time, a fierce debate has erupted over censorship and freedom of expression following the UK's proposed social media restrictions. Critics, including Elon Musk, have argued that measures presented as online safety protections could become tools for surveillance and control. Supporters insist stronger regulation is necessary to tackle harmful content, misinformation and online abuse.Niall and Cormac discuss why so many people no longer trust traditional news organisations, whether journalists and media outlets have become too closely aligned with political and ideological agendas, and what role censorship, fact-checking and government regulation may be playing in the public's growing scepticism.As public confidence continues to fall, the conversation asks a fundamental question: are people losing trust in the news because the media is failing the public, or because social media has fundamentally changed how we consume and judge information?It's a thought-provoking discussion about trust, journalism, censorship, free speech and who gets to decide what information the public should be allowed to see.

On today's podcast, Niall Boylan opens the lines to callers to debate a controversial new pilot scheme being introduced in Irish prisons.Under the initiative, prisoners in the Dóchas Centre and the Training Unit on the Mountjoy campus will, for the first time, be able to receive direct phone calls from approved family members and friends straight to telephones in their cells. The Irish Prison Service says the three month pilot is designed to strengthen family connections, improve prisoner stability and support rehabilitation. Calls will be limited, monitored and can be withdrawn as a privilege if prisoners misuse the system or breach prison rules. Prisoners will be restricted to two inbound calls per day, each lasting up to 10 minutes, and all calls will be recorded.Supporters argue that maintaining contact with loved ones is one of the most effective ways to reduce reoffending and help prisoners successfully reintegrate into society after release. They say prison should not simply be about punishment but also about rehabilitation, and that stronger family ties can play a vital role in preventing future crime. The Irish Prison Service has said the scheme is specifically intended to enhance family support and improve rehabilitation outcomes.Critics, however, have reacted angrily online. Many believe prison is supposed to be a punishment and that inmates already enjoy too many privileges. Some have questioned why offenders should receive direct phone access to their cells when many law-abiding citizens struggle with rising costs and long waits for public services. Others argue that victims and their families are too often forgotten in discussions about prisoner welfare.So where do you stand?Are direct calls to prison cells a sensible rehabilitation measure that could reduce reoffending and improve behaviour, or is this another example of prisoners being given comforts they simply don't deserve?Should prison focus primarily on punishment, rehabilitation, or both?And are we becoming too soft on crime?Niall hears from callers on both sides of this increasingly heated debate

On this episode of The Niall Boylan Podcast, Niall opens the lines to callers to discuss a controversial new proposal that could see owners of derelict properties hit with massive annual tax bills.Finance Minister Simon Harris is bringing proposals to Cabinet for a new Derelict Property Tax that would replace the existing derelict sites levy and allow Revenue to collect the charge directly. Under the plan, owners of derelict properties could face an annual tax of at least 7% of the property's market value unless the building is renovated and brought back into use. The government says the move is necessary because local authorities have "badly failed" to enforce the current system and thousands of potentially usable properties remain vacant during Ireland's housing crisis. The new tax is expected to apply initially in more than 100 towns and cities across the country and will be backed by Revenue's enforcement powers. According to Simon Harris, property owners have a choice: bring the property back into use or face what he described as a "hefty tax". Latest estimates suggest there are almost 19,500 derelict residential properties across Ireland.Supporters argue that with so many people struggling to buy or rent a home, it is unacceptable for thousands of properties to sit empty and deteriorate. They say owners have had years to act and that strong financial penalties are needed to force unused homes back onto the market.Critics, however, see it as another attack on property rights. They point out that owners have already paid income tax on the money used to buy the property, paid stamp duty when purchasing it and continue to pay various property-related taxes. They argue that the State is now effectively imposing a recurring penalty simply because somebody chooses not to use their property in a way the government approves of.For some owners, the bill could run into tens of thousands of euro every year. A property valued at €500,000 could face a charge of €35,000 annually under a 7% tax rate.So where should the balance lie? Should the State have the power to financially punish people for leaving a property vacant? Is this a reasonable response to a housing emergency, or a dangerous precedent that undermines private property rights?Niall asks callers: if you own something, should the government be able to tax you into using it, selling it or renovating it? Or is this exactly the kind of action needed to tackle Ireland's housing crisis?