The Only Thing That Lasts

You probably know about the trolley problem, where someone is forced to make a decision between inaction that kills five people, or making an effort that kills only one. In this episode of The Only Thing That Lasts, host Sarah Mock looks at this quandary from an agricultural lens. As in, when do we let nature simply take its course, or when do we take action to minimize harm — even when there can be other, peripheral harms? It's an episode that explores differing views on conservation, and how we manage agriculture in America.

After 8 episodes of The Only Thing That Lasts, looking at the deeply complicated history of farmland in America, host Sarah Mock brings us into the present day, with an episode on the factors working to both a) lessen our collective amount of farmland and b) make it more challenging for aspiring farmers to get their own plot. It's a challenging situation, but Sarah doesn't despair: She speaks to farmers and farmland investors who are working to consider new ways to approach the land question. Not all hope is lost!

Let's talk about the Dust Bowl. This distinctly American sliver of history, which most of us were schooled on with The Grapes of Wrath, was more than an act of God — it resulted from a host of short-sighted policy and farming practices. But the Dust Bowl's cloud of consequences have persisted to this day, helping shape virtually every element of modern agriculture. In the latest episode of TOTTL, Sarah Mock explores this complicated legacy, and how many mistakes are doomed to be repeated.

The Homestead Act of 1862 changed the path of many thousands of Americans, who were given $1.1 trillion in free land to farm. Their descendents, who make up 25% of the U.S. population today, are still living off the legacy of those valuable gifts.

In the first episode of our 8-episode limited series, agriculture journalist Sarah Mock unpacks the dire warnings advocates are making — namely, that we're losing thousands of acres of U.S. farmland every day. What does this loss actually mean, contrasted with issues like our lack of affordable housing? And, perhaps more importantly, should we be worried about our food supply?