
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 1 chart position in 1 market.
By chart position
- 🇺🇸US · Management#1715K to 30K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
2.5K to 15K🎙 Weekly cadence·100 episodes·Last published 3d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
5K to 30K🇺🇸100% - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
1.5K to 9K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
Recent episodes
New York's budget: What didn't happen says as much as what did
Jun 2, 2026
Unknown duration
Curly fries and conjunctive tests: Business income, explained
May 27, 2026
Unknown duration
Federal preemption primer: The Supremacy Clause and state tax limits
May 14, 2026
Unknown duration
A Texas two-step on franchise tax: Lessons from NuStar and American Airlines
Apr 28, 2026
Unknown duration
Shedding light on tax administration through FOIA
Apr 14, 2026
Unknown duration
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Description | Length | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/2/26 | New York's budget: What didn't happen says as much as what did | The long-awaited New York State budgetGovernor Hochul signs New York FY 2027 Budget into law | SALT ShakerGovernor Hochul signs New York FY 2027 Budget into law | SALT Shaker has arrived, and while it may not have produced major headline-grabbing tax increases, there's plenty beneath the surface worth unpacking. In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor are joined by Ken Pokalsky, Vice President of Government Affairs at The Business Council of New York State, to break down what made it into the budget, what didn't – and how the budget's tax provisions will impact New York taxpayers moving forward. Ken shares an insider's perspective from Albany, exploring why this year's negotiations stretched well past the April 1 deadline, how competing political priorities shaped the final deal, and why, in his words, the takeaway might be: "It could have been worse." The conversation also touches on early warning signs for next year's budget cycle. And, of course, the episode wraps with a lighthearted debate on whether punctuality is overrated or underrated. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 5/27/26 | Curly fries and conjunctive tests: Business income, explained | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor break down the business versus non-business income divide. They also explore how the Multistate Tax Commission's recommended shift in terminology – from business/non-business income to apportionable/non-apportionable income – refocuses the analysis on whether income is constitutionally apportionable. Chelsea and Jeremy then walk through the two key tests used in determining business income: the transactional test and the functional test, and how these tests often overlap. Their discussion centers on the Arkansas Supreme Court's recent decision in Hudson v. US Beef, involving the sale of franchise operations. The court found the gains from the sale were non-business income under the three requirements in Arkansas' business income definition. Chelsea and Jeremy also unpack the dissent, which argued the majority improperly blended the functional and transactional tests, underscoring how fact-specific – and potentially blurred – this analysis can be. The episode concludes with key takeaways on applying these tests across jurisdictions, along with an overrated/underrated debate on summer staples. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 5/14/26 | Federal preemption primer: The Supremacy Clause and state tax limits | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor introduce federal preemption and how the Supremacy Clause limits state taxing authority. When federal and state laws conflict, federal law controls, requiring state law to give way. Jeremy and Chelsea outline the two types of preemption: express and implied. Drawing on examples from technology, services, and digital advertising taxes, the discussion highlights the continued importance, and active litigation, surrounding preemption in the SALT space. You can follow along with the discussion using Congress's "preemption taxonomy" chart, linked here. The episode concludes with a brief overrated/underrated debate on the Oxford comma. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 4/28/26 | A Texas two-step on franchise tax: Lessons from NuStar and American Airlines | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor break down two noteworthy Texas franchise tax decisions that provide important guidance on sourcing and federal preemption. The hosts first discuss NuStar Energy LP v. Hancock, a Texas Supreme Court decision addressing how receipts from the sale of tangible personal property are sourced for franchise tax purposes. The court held that receipts are sourced to Texas based on where the property is delivered to the buyer, rejecting an "ultimate use" or consumption-based approach, even where the property (bunker fuel) could not legally be used in Texas. They then turn to Hancock v. American Airlines, where a Texas appellate court concluded that the federal Anti‑Head Tax Act preempts application of the Texas franchise tax to certain airline revenue streams. The court determined that, despite being styled as a margin tax, the franchise tax functions as a tax on gross receipts from air transportation, bringing it within the scope of federal preemption. The episode wraps up with an overrated/underrated debate on standing desks. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 4/14/26 | Shedding light on tax administration through FOIA | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, hosts and Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor welcome Lauren Loricchio, Investigations Editor at Tax Notes, to discuss the publication's long‑standing commitment to government transparency and access to primary tax materials. Lauren traces the origins of Tax Notes back to its 1972 lawsuit against the IRS, which paved the way for public access to the Service's private letter rulings. She explains how her team continues that mission through its newly launched monthly newsletter, FOIA Findings, which uses the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and other open records laws to shed light on tax policy and tax administration. Their discussion explores the realities of the FOIA process – including delays, redactions, and litigation – and why access to original source material remains critical for tax practitioners, academics, and others monitoring tax administration and enforcement. The episode wraps up with a seasonal overrated/underrated segment: What are your thoughts on wearing shorts? For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 3/31/26 | A "third way" forward: Declaratory judgments in state tax disputes | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor sit down with Counsel Charles Capouet to discuss his recent article in Tax Notes State on the use of declaratory judgments to challenge unconstitutional state taxes. Charles explains how declaratory judgments can serve as a "third way" to contest a tax, allowing taxpayers to seek an early, definitive ruling on a tax's legality, often before experiencing significant financial impact. Interest in these actions is growing as states continue to adopt novel taxes that raise unresolved constitutional questions, and the conversation explores how this approach can benefit both taxpayers and states by providing greater certainty and helping avoid budget disruptions tied to later refunds. The group also discusses the limitations of declaratory judgment actions, which are typically confined to facial constitutional challenges and permitted only in certain states. The episode concludes with a timely "overrated/underrated" segment where the group discusses Opening Day of baseball. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 3/17/26 | To challenge or not? Evaluating tax assessments after an audit | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor examine a pivotal moment in any state and local tax controversy: whether to take the next step after a tax assessment has been issued. Jeremy and Chelsea walk through the key factors they consider when deciding whether to challenge an assessment following an audit. They emphasize that the decision is rarely straightforward and often requires balancing several considerations, such as financial significance, procedural nuances, confidentiality protections, and the forum's independence and expertise. Their conversation concludes with a focus on litigation readiness, underscoring why building a strong evidentiary record during the audit stage is critical to preserving options and positioning a case for success beyond the administrative level. In closing, they wonder if buying a "mystery" book at the bookstore is overrated or underrated. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 2/17/26 | Clicks, data, and dollars: Understanding state digital services taxes | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor unpack one of SALT's highly discussed and fast‑evolving areas: digital services taxes. Their conversation breaks digital services taxes into four distinct frameworks, helping listeners understand how states and localities are approaching the taxation of digital activity in different ways. The discussion covers Maryland's digital advertising tax, Washington's expansion of its sales tax to digital services, Chicago's social media amusement tax, and proposed data taxes – such as those in New York – that would impose tax based on the volume of consumer data companies collect and maintain. In closing, they wonder if the Winter Olympics are overrated or underrated. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 2/3/26 | The primary function test strikes again: Lessons from Beeline | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor break down a recent New York Appellate Division decision addressing a longstanding question in New York: Is providing a license to software always the sale of software? Jeremy and Chelsea unpack the Appellate Division's answer to that question in Beeline, who offered its customers a license to taxable prewritten software and nontaxable professional services. Applying New York's primary function test, and relying on the extensive record developed below, the court concluded that the transaction's objective was the taxable sale of software rather than nontaxable professional services. This week's overrated/underrated question takes on a fun one: birthdays. Are they overrated or underrated? For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 1/20/26 | Charting the journey: Celebrating our new SALT partners | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Partner Jeff Friedman takes over as host and sits down with newly promoted partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor to celebrate their career milestones and reflect on the journeys that brought them here. Jeff guides Chelsea and Jeremy through a conversation about their distinct professional paths, the value of in‑person collaboration, and the satisfaction that comes from navigating complex client matters. They also look ahead, offering their perspectives on the developments they expect will reshape the practice of state and local tax in the years to come. The episode closes with the classic overrated/underrated segment – this time tackling award shows. Are they overrated or underrated? For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog | — | ||||||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 1/8/26 | New year, same SALT: Lightning round on 2025's biggest topics | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, SALT Partners Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor kick off 2026 with a lightning round of their favorite SALT issues from 2025. They cover market-based sourcing, tax base expansions, remote worker litigation, and the classification of streaming services as tangible property. The conversation also touches on federal intervention in AI regulation, the ongoing relevance of federal limits on state taxing power, and emerging local tax trends. This week's overrated/underrated segment asks: Are New Year's resolutions overrated or underrated? For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 12/16/25 | Retroactive rules and revenue streams: A New York tax wrap-up | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, SALT Counsel Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor break down key New York tax and administrative developments shaping 2025. Their discussion includes: The proposed agenda of the incoming New York City mayor Significant personnel and administrative changes in New York City Recent court rulings on the retroactivity of the corporate income tax regulations Emerging tax revenue streams from legalized casinos and congestion pricing They wrap up with two thought-provoking questions in the overrated/underrated segment – don't miss it! For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 11/25/25 | Decoding the gray areas of SALT penalty standards | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, SALT Counsel Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor dive into the nuanced world of state and local tax penalties. They explore why penalty abatement standards, such as "reasonable cause" and "ordinary care," remain ambiguous despite the frequent appearance of penalties in tax assessments. With limited statutory and case law guidance, these standards often leave taxpayers navigating uncertainty. Their discussion highlights: New York's penalty framework and how it compares to other states Practical defenses for abating penalties, including their self-coined "reliance plus" standard The importance of contemporaneous documentation in supporting taxpayer positions Ultimately, Jeremy and Chelsea underscore the highly technical and interpretive nature of penalty imposition and abatement. For a deeper dive into this topic, read their article in Tax Notes State. This week's overrated/underrated segment takes a seasonal turn: Is turkey really the star of Thanksgiving? For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 11/11/25 | The evolution of California's sales factor | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, host and SALT Counsel Jeremy Gove sits down with Partner Tim Gustafson to explore the historical evolution and current challenges surrounding California's sales factor. The conversation traces California's apportionment journey from its original equally weighted three-factor formula to today's dominant single sales factor approach. Jeremy and Tim unpack key developments, including: California Supreme Court decisions shaping the definition of "gross receipts" A voter-approved initiative accelerating the shift to a single sales factor Regulatory amendments relating to market-based sourcing The episode concludes with a discussion of a recent legislative change redefining "gross sales" as "net sales" – a retroactive adjustment now facing legal challenges for its conflict with prior judicial interpretations. Plus, don't miss the overrated/underrated segment, where Jeremy and Tim share their hot takes on card games. For a deeper dive into this topic, check out Tim's article, published in Tax Notes State, which he co-wrote with Associate Constance Chien. | — | ||||||
| 10/28/25 | AI and SALT: A new frontier | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, SALT Counsel Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor dive into the evolving intersection of artificial intelligence (AI) and SALT. As AI technology continues to advance, Jeremy and Chelsea draw a parallel for tax purposes to the early days of the internet – when Congress passed the ITFA to avoid taxes stifling innovation. They explore whether the existing framework for taxing software and digital products is sufficient to address AI, or if new legislation will be needed to keep pace. Jeremy and Chelsea highlight recent developments in Indiana and Illinois, where revenue rulings classified remote generative AI chatbot services as non-taxable under the states' existing definitions of SaaS and electronically delivered software. The episode wraps with a brief discussion on the potential for federal intervention in regulating and taxing AI, leaving listeners with key questions about how SALT professionals should prepare for what's next. And, as always, the hosts close out with their overrated/underrated segment – this time tackling the world of science fiction. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 10/2/25 | Navigating Public Law 86-272: A modern interpretation | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Counsel Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor unpack the complexities of Public Law 86-272, a federal statute enacted in 1959 to shield businesses from state income tax when their sole activity within a state is soliciting orders for tangible personal property. The conversation explores the law's origins, historical context, its continued relevance in state tax litigation, and the MTC's evolving guidance regarding internet-based activities. Chelsea and Jeremy conclude the discussion by reviewing recent legal battles over the law in California, New York, and New Jersey, and exploring what these cases mean for the future of PL 86-272. Tune in to find out how Jeremy returns to his favorite nontax tradition of overrated/underrated! Questions or comments? Email us at SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe for regular updates from stateandlocaltax.com. | — | ||||||
| 4/8/25 | Analyzing Hologic, Inc. v. Stepp: Key takeaways | In the latest episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Counsel Jeremy Gove and Chelsea Marmor explore a new, concise podcast format that provides updates on recent noteworthy cases. Jeremy and Chelsea examine a New Hampshire court's decision in Hologic, Inc. v. Stepp, covering the facts, the court's holding, the analysis, and the case's practical implications. They wrap up the episode with a new segment, asking "either/or" – do you prefer the vernal equinox or autumn equinox? You can read our summary of Hologic, Inc. v. Stepp here. For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 7/10/24 | Taxing truths: A discussion on the use tax implications in Ellingson Drainage | In the latest episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland attorneys Jeff Friedman and Jeremy Gove welcome UConn School of Law Professor Rick Pomp to discuss Jeff and Professor Pomp's US Supreme Court cert petition in Ellingson Drainage, Inc. v. South Dakota Department of Revenue. Jeff, Jeremy and Professor Pomp delve into the case's background and its various implications, particularly focusing on the application of use tax. They also provide historical context on the relationship between sales and use taxes and explore how Ellingson may violate the external consistency doctrine. Additionally, they discuss the potential consequences of the South Dakota Supreme Court's decision if left undisturbed by the US Supreme Court. Their discussion ends with an overrated/underrated question: Are birthday parties overrated or underrated? For questions or comments, email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. Subscribe to receive regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 6/6/24 | Sifting through the complexities of San Francisco's tax system | In the newest episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Counsel Jeremy Gove takes a close look at San Francisco's tax system with the help of Eversheds Sutherland Counsel John Ormonde and Bart Baer, Chief Tax Counsel for The California Taxpayers Association. Jeremy, John and Bart review San Francisco from a tax perspective, specifically discussing its various gross receipts taxes, including the homelessness gross receipts tax, and overpaid executive gross receipts tax. They discuss how these taxes affect the business tax climate in San Francisco, and the latest news affecting the city's business tax system, including the reduction of in-office workers. They also cover the current reform efforts in the city and impacts of these taxes at the local level. Their discussion concludes with a breakfast themed overrated/underrated question – where does oatmeal fall on the spectrum of breakfast food? Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 4/12/24 | Examining the life of a SALT practitioner | In the latest episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Counsel Jeremy Gove welcomes Tyler Henderson, Senior Tax Manager at Amazon, for a discussion about Tyler's experiences as a SALT practitioner. Tyler sheds light on his journey to his current position, including why he chose to enter the tax field, what he enjoys about his role and what drives him to serve in the educational sector, as well. Jeremy and Tyler wrap up their conversation with an overrated/underrated question: How do you feel about re-watching TV shows? Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 3/22/24 | Forecasting the future of FTB's informal guidance | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Counsel Jeremy Gove welcomes back Sacramento SALT Partner Tim Gustafson for another California-focused conversation! Tim and Jeremy base their discussion around a recent article Tim co-authored in Tax Notes State with Associate Sharon Kaur about the California FTB's informal guidance. Specifically, they delve into the work of the FTB, which administers the state's corporate franchise and income taxes, and discuss its routine issuance of informal guidance on a broad array of topics and issues. Tim and Jeremy explore these topics, as well as the effect on taxpayers and practitioners. Similar to the article, Tim and Jeremy also cover two 2023 decisions, Appeal of Minnesota Beet and American Catalog Mailers Association, examining how these decisions may affect current informal guidance and the issuance of guidance in 2024 and beyond. The episode concludes with another edition of overrated/underrated – how do you feel about lettuce on sandwiches? Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 12/21/23 | Landmark state tax cases: The impact of Moorman on apportionment | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Associate Jeremy Gove welcomes Partner Jeff Friedman for another discussion of a landmark state tax case. For this installment, Jeff and Jeremy jump into Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair, discussing the history of 3-factor apportionment, and how the Moorman decision paved the way for states shifting to single-sales factor apportionment. After their discussion, the episode wraps with another edition of overrated/underrated – how do you feel about adults dressing up for Halloween? Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 11/30/23 | A federal tax perspective on Moore v. United States | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Federal Tax Partner Mary Monahan joins Associate Jeremy Gove for a discussion of Moore v. United States. Ahead of the oral argument scheduled for December 5, Mary provides Jeremy with a federal tax perspective about the case, including covering the case's background, the tax constitutionality issue before the Supreme Court, the legal arguments presented and more. Their discussion concludes with a timely overrated/underrated question, likely debated by many last week – what are your thoughts on Thanksgiving turkey? You can read the Eversheds Sutherland Tax team's Legal Alert about Moore at this link. Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 9/14/23 | Wading through the water's-edge combined reporting method | This episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast welcomes a new voice into the mix, Eversheds Sutherland Associate Laurin McDonald. Laurin joins host and Associate Jeremy Gove to describe 80/20 rules used by states in the context of water's-edge combined reporting, the subject of an article she co-authored in Tax Notes State. In addition to discussing the 80/20 rules, Jeremy and Laurin cover variations on the rules, compliance issues and recent cases that exemplify controversies that can arise from application of 80/20 rules. They wrap with an underrated/overrated question – how do you feel about concert encores? Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
| 8/10/23 | The evolution of market sourcing in California | In this episode of the SALT Shaker Podcast, Eversheds Sutherland Partner Tim Gustafson joins Associate Jeremy Gove for a deep dive into California's market-based sourcing regulation. Together they discuss various interpretations of and proposed amendments to the regulation offered over the past six years, and how the interpretations and amendments might affect taxpayers. They wrap with a series of underrated/overrated questions related to scents. You can read Tim's article on the topic for Tax Notes State here. Questions or comments? Email SALTonline@eversheds-sutherland.com. You can also subscribe to receive our regular updates hosted on the SALT Shaker blog. | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 100
Sponsor Intelligence
Sign in to see which brands sponsor this podcast, their ad offers, and promo codes.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
