
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 8 chart positions in 8 markets.
By chart position
- 🇳🇱NL · Philosophy#1531K to 10K
- 🇸🇪SE · Philosophy#1881K to 10K
- 🇮🇩ID · Philosophy#2410K to 30K
- 🇩🇰DK · Philosophy#123500 to 3K
- 🇳🇴NO · Philosophy#135500 to 3K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
7.3K to 33K🎙 ~2x weekly·138 episodes·Last published 2w ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
15K to 65K🇮🇩46%🇳🇱15%🇸🇪15%+5 more - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
5.8K to 26K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 14 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
Episode 142: Self Deception and Dogmatism
Jun 16, 2026
Unknown duration
Episode 141: Probability and Reality (with Sam Kuypers)
Jun 2, 2026
2h 28m 57s
Episode 140: Immunizing Stratagems
May 19, 2026
1h 55m 06s
Episode 139: The Rational Doomers
May 9, 2026
1h 10m 26s
Episode 138: "Popperian" vs "Deutschian" Epistemology
Apr 29, 2026
1h 54m 58s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/16/26 | ![]() Episode 142: Self Deception and Dogmatism | Is so-called "self-deception" a real thing? How can one at once be aware that something is true and yet also be unaware of it? Is it even a coherent concept? Doesn't deception require at least two entities—the deceived and the deceiver? Can "self-deception" be explained as something much simpler, namely deception?Bruce summarizes his views on self-deception, moralizing, and dogmatism from a critical rationalist perspective, as well as it's relevance for AGI, "Super Intelligences", and human dogmatism.Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 6/2/26 | ![]() Episode 141: Probability and Reality (with Sam Kuypers)✨ | probability theoryquantum physics+3 | Sam Kuypers | Conjecture Institute | — | probability theoryquantum physics+3 | — | 2h 28m 57s | |
| 5/19/26 | ![]() Episode 140: Immunizing Stratagems✨ | theoryrefutation+4 | Ray Scott Percival | The Myth of the Closed MindIdeologies as Shapeshifters | — | Karl Popperimmunizing stratagems+5 | — | 1h 55m 06s | |
| 5/9/26 | ![]() Episode 139: The Rational Doomers✨ | AIdoomers+3 | — | — | — | AIdoomers+5 | — | 1h 10m 26s | |
| 4/29/26 | ![]() Episode 138: "Popperian" vs "Deutschian" Epistemology✨ | epistemologyCritical Rationalism+5 | — | CritRats | — | PopperDeutsch+6 | — | 1h 54m 58s | |
| 4/15/26 | ![]() Episode 137: Ray Scott Percival on Incurable Mind Viruses✨ | critical rationalismmemes+3 | Ray Scott Percival | QuilletteLiberty Loves Reason+1 | — | critical rationalismmind viruses+3 | — | 2h 07m 55s | |
| 3/31/26 | ![]() Episode 136: Michael Golding on Mental Illness and Universal Explainers✨ | mental illnessuniversal explainers+3 | Michael Golding | My Madness | — | mental illnessuniversal explainers+5 | — | 2h 09m 31s | |
| 3/10/26 | ![]() Episode 135: Coercion and Critical Rationalism✨ | critical rationalismnon-aggression principle+4 | — | Patreon | — | critical rationalismnon-aggression principle+6 | — | 1h 42m 06s | |
| 2/24/26 | ![]() Episode 134: The Deutsch Slot Machine✨ | probabilitymathematics+3 | — | — | — | Deutschprobability+3 | — | 2h 23m 40s | |
| 2/10/26 | ![]() Episode 133: The Constitution of Knowledge✨ | epistemologyobjective knowledge+3 | — | The Constitution of Knowledge | — | epistemologyobjective knowledge+6 | — | 40m 51s | |
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 2/3/26 | ![]() Episode 132: Roughly Testable Theories (and Ancaps)✨ | critical rationalismeconomics+4 | — | Anarcho CapitalismPraxeology | — | critical rationalismfallibilism+5 | — | 1h 04m 49s | |
| 1/27/26 | ![]() Episode 131: Knowledge as a Concept✨ | knowledgeconcepts+3 | — | knowledge | — | knowledgeconcepts+3 | — | 24m 04s | |
| 1/20/26 | ![]() Episode 130: The "Pseudo Deutsch Theory of Knowledge"✨ | theory of knowledgecritical rationalism+3 | — | CritRats | — | knowledgetheory+3 | — | 55m 05s | |
| 1/13/26 | ![]() Episode 129: Is Probability Real?✨ | probabilityrandomness+3 | — | — | — | probabilityrandomness+3 | — | 59m 24s | |
| 1/6/26 | ![]() Episode 128: Induction’s Immunizing Strategy✨ | inductionphilosophy+3 | Kieren | — | — | inductionCritical Rationalism+5 | — | 58m 50s | |
| 12/30/25 | ![]() Episode 127: Hofstadter vs Popper on Concepts | Here Bruce starts with Popper’s assertion that theories are 100x more valuable than concepts and compares it to Douglas Hofstadter’s ideas on creativity and consciousness. But if concepts matter so little, where do conjectures originate? Popper offers little on this point, yet Hofstadter’s view of the human mind as a system of self-referential feedback loops—able to bridge gaps that formal logic cannot—may provide a useful way to think about it.And while we’re at it, let’s poke at one of the CritRats’ sacred cows: is it actually the case that observations have no role other than helping us pick between rival theories?Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 12/23/25 | ![]() Episode 126: The Concept of Concepts | What is a concept? What is a theory? And was Karl Popper right when he said theories are “100 times more valuable” than concepts? But where do conjectures come from?We go over Popper's own writing about concepts and his explanation for why he feels they are less valuable than theories. Does this prove Bruce wrong from back in episode 112 where he claimed concepts are more valuable than words? What would Popper say?Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 12/16/25 | ![]() Episode 125: Our Lovecraftian Universe? | This week we welcome back Micah Redding of the Christian Transhumanist podcast. We had a joyful conversation touching on religion, science fiction, and teleology. We look at the ways science fiction and fantasy triggers our moral intuitions regarding what kind of universe we live in with respect to meaning. Do we live in an inherently meaningful universe (teleology); a meaning neutral universe in line with existentialism, materialism, or naturalism; or an actively-malevolent Lovecraftian universe?Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 12/9/25 | ![]() Episode 124: Popper's Evolutionary Theory of Knowledge | aka "The Popper vs Campbell Beatdown!"At long last! The showdown you've all been waiting for! These two giants of epistemology meet in the ring and fight it out for dominance!Bruce continues his exploration of evolutionary epistemology, or the idea that all knowledge creation in nature is analogous to natural selection. Specifically, Bruce discusses how Karl Popper’s critical rationalism is—and is not—related to Donald Campbell’s concept of evolutionary epistemology, which it seems Popper mostly endorsed. But is Popper’s conjecture and refutation really the same as Campbell’s blind variation and selective retention? And would Popper have agreed with David Deutsch that "All an animal's knowledge is in its genes?" (In fact, Popper explicitly answers that question! Multiple times! Tune in to find out!)Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 12/2/25 | ![]() Episode 123: Campbell vs Deutsch: Incremental vs Cosmic Significance | Bruce compares Donald Campbell’s evolutionary epistemology and David Deutsch’s ideas on infinite knowledge growth. What is knowledge growth? Is it a rare thing limited to only biological evolution and human ideas, as Deutsch seems to argue? (Does he argue that?) Or is it a ubiquitous process that happens all around us at all levels of nature as Campbell argues?Is knowledge created in human minds an incremental process, as Campbell might emphasize, based on blind variation and selection? Or as Deutsch might emphasize, is this a cosmically significant, open-ended process based on creativity and explanation? Can these two great thinkers ideas be reconciled or are they in contradiction to each other?Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 11/25/25 | ![]() Episode 122: The Case Against Logical Fallacies | In this shorter episode Bruce takes a deep dive into logical fallacies. How useful are logical fallacies? Does pointing out a logical fallacy help correct errors? Does doing so make us more rational? Can we become more logical by avoiding ad hominem attacks, not straw-manning or appealing to authority, and avoiding slippery slopes? And is there a difference between a logical fallacy and a rational fallacy? If so, which is more important?Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 11/18/25 | ![]() Episode 121: Beliefs | In our previous episode covering Strevens' critique of Popper, we briefly touched on why Bruce believes it it a mistake for CritRats to say they don't believe in beliefs. This time Bruce takes a deep dive into beliefs -- and walks back his previous statement a bit. Do humans need beliefs? Are beliefs dangerous? What is the critical rationalist position on beliefs? What did Popper say? And can we even realistically live without beliefs?And along the way, Bruce criticizes "the disobedience criteria" as a way to make his point about the value -- and dangers -- of mythic belief systems and why we need them and why they can confuse us rationally. Support us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 11/11/25 | ![]() Episode 120: Popper on Trial | This week Bruce puts Popper on trial. Specifically, through the lens of Michael Stevens’s book, The Knowledge Machine, which argues that science works because it follows the “iron law of explanation” where scientists must (at least in public) put aside philosophy, politics, and theology and only follow empirical evidence. Bruce asks, how compatible is this view with the epistemology of Karl Popper?And does Strevens' critique of Popper ring true? Or is it a strawman? | — | ||||||
| 10/28/25 | ![]() Episode 119: New Right vs Libertarianism w/Logan Chipkin | This week we interview Logan Chipkin. Logan is a writer and author of several books. Recently he co-authored and published The Sovereign Child about raising children without coercion, and The Lords of the Cosmos, which tells the story of progress through the lens of good philosophy. Logan is also the president of Conjecture Institute, which is a brand new organization dedicated to promoting the worldview of Karl Popper and David Deutsch. (Follow on X)Here we discuss the New Right vs libertarianism. We consider: What is the core difference between liberalism, conservatism, and libertarianism? Why are so many libertarians into conspiracy theories? How are we to think about Popperian arguments against utopianism applied to libertarians? Does it make sense for an anarcho-capitalist to be hawkish on military intervention in places like Ukraine? And why have mainstream conservatives strayed so far from making intellectual arguments for their positions as they may have in the days or Milton Friedman?What criticisms can be correctly leveled against the Right today, especially economically but also in terms of their methods. And what does the New Right 'get right' according to Logan?Right wing resources suggested by Logan:The DispatchCommentary Magazine PodcastNational Review PodcastThe Politically Incorrect Guide to American HistoryThe Right: The Hundred-Year War for American ConservatismRadicals for Capitalism: A Freewheeling History of the Modern American Libertarian MovementSupport us on Patreon | — | ||||||
| 10/14/25 | ![]() Episode 118: Christian Transhumanism (with Micah Redding) | This week we talk to Micah Redding, the host of the Christian Transhumanist podcast. We discuss: What is the significance of a singularity? What is free will from a many worlds perspective? Does Omega Point cosmology solve the problem of evil? And most importantly, will my sweet dog Jojo join me in the afterlife? | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 126
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Chart Positions
8 placements across 8 markets.
Chart Positions
8 placements across 8 markets.
