Think for Christ

What happens when the world of Plato meets the world of Christ? In the final installment of this three-part series on Platonism, Dr. Anthony Alberino sits down with Dr. Michael Wiitala to explore the fascinating relationship between Christianity and the Platonic tradition. From the Gospel of John’s doctrine of the Logos to the profound influence of Platonism on the Church Fathers, creeds, and classical Christian theology, this episode examines how Christian thinkers appropriated, transformed, and sometimes rejected elements of Greek philosophy in their effort to understand and articulate the faith. The discussion covers Philo of Alexandria, Justin Martyr, Clement of Alexandria, Origen, Augustine, Dionysius the Areopagite, Maximus the Confessor, and other major figures in the Christian Platonic tradition. Dr. Wiitala also explains why Platonism proved uniquely attractive to early Christians, how it shaped doctrines concerning God, creation, immaterial reality, providence, and the soul, and where important disagreements emerged regarding creation, reincarnation, emanation, and pagan religion. Finally, Anthony and Michael address contemporary criticisms of Christian Platonism and ask whether the synthesis of faith and philosophy remains a fruitful project for Christian thinkers today. Topics Covered: The Logos in John's Gospel and Philo of AlexandriaPlatonism and the Early Church FathersAugustine's conversion and the NeoplatonistsChristian Platonism and the Ecumenical CreedsProvidence, creation, and the transcendence of GodThe Trinity and Platonic metaphysicsTheosis and the Christian life Critiques of Christian PlatonismIs Christian Platonism still relevant today? This episode concludes our series: Part 1: On Plato and Platonism Part 2: On Neoplatonism Part 3: On Christian Platonism If you enjoy thoughtful conversations on philosophy, theology, and the intellectual foundations of Christianity, be sure to like, subscribe, and share. #ChristianPlatonism #Plato #Christianity #Theology #Philosophy #Augustine #Neoplatonism #ChurchFathers #Logos #ThinkForChrist

For most of church history, Christians have confessed the doctrine of divine simplicity—the teaching that God is not composed of parts. But what does this mean, and why does it matter? In this episode, Anthony Alberino explores the profound connection between God’s simplicity and His unity. We’ll see why the classical tradition insists that God is not only without physical parts but also without metaphysical or even logical parts. Unlike creatures—composites of act and potency, essence and existence—God is utterly uncomposed. Because composed beings are dependent beings, only a God who is absolutely simple can be the uncaused, necessary, and independent source of all reality. From here, Anthony shows how divine simplicity grounds divine unity:Simplicity means that God not composed of parts and that all that is in God is God. His attributes are not distinct “parts” but are identical with His essence—and thus with each other.Unity follows because an absolutely simple being cannot, even in principle, be divided. God is not one member of a class called “deity,” but the one and only subsistent Being itself. Along the way, we’ll consider why the attributes of God—wisdom, love, justice, power—are distinct in our minds but perfectly identical in God’s essence, using the analogy of white light refracted through a prism. We’ll also see how divine simplicity marks the sharp metaphysical divide between Creator and creature, and why this doctrine has been central to Christian theology throughout the centuries. Finally, we touch on the connection between divine simplicity and the doctrine of the Trinity, and why classical theology maintains that distinction within God does not imply composition. If you’re seeking to understand why divine simplicity has been called “the bedrock of classical theism,” this episode is for you. 📺 Watch next: https://youtu.be/tuUf7VCTGfM, https://youtu.be/LeyRhQD7IWQ

In this episode, Anthony Alberino and Andrew Payne critically interact with one of the most popular and philosophically sophisticated attempts to reconcile God’s sovereignty with human libertarian freedom: Molinism. We’ve already considered the Thomistic “Dual Sources” view with Dr. Matthews Grant, and in the last episode we examined Open Theism. Now, we look at Molinism — a view originating with the 16th-century Jesuit Luis de Molina and defended today by leading philosophers such as Alvin Plantinga, William Lane Craig, and Thomas Flint. Molinism hinges on the idea of middle knowledge: God’s knowledge of what any possible free creature would do in any possible circumstance. By appealing to middle knowledge, Molinists argue that God can sovereignly order the world while preserving genuine human freedom. In this discussion, we:Explain Molina’s distinction between natural knowledge, middle knowledge, and free knowledge.Show how middle knowledge is supposed to secure both meticulous providence and libertarian free will.Explore why Molinism has been attractive to many theologians and philosophers, particularly within Arminian circles.Critically engage key challenges to Molinism, including the grounding objection, the tension with libertarian freedom, and problems related to divine aseity, simplicity, and sovereignty.Compare Molinism with both Open Theism and classical theism to see whether it truly resolves the tension between divine providence and human agency. Does Molinism succeed where other views fail? Or does it compromise God’s ultimacy and the very nature of freedom? Join us as we unpack and critically examine this influential theological model.

When it comes to the question of divine and human agency, the prevailing view among Christian theologians and philosophers (not to mention Christian laypeople) is that it is zero sum game. In other words, the more agency God exercises over the human will, the less agency the human has. It seems like we have to make a choice here. We have to either choose to uphold God’s universal causality and diminish human freedom or choose to uphold human freedom and diminish God’s causality. But, in his book Free Will and God’s Universal Causality, Dr. W. Matthews Grant denies that such a choice has to be made. Dr. Grant argues that by embracing a Dual Sources Account, we can resolve the conflict between human freedom divine causality without diminishing either. In this episode of Think for Christ, Dr. W. Matthews Grant joins Anthony Alberino to talk about divine causation and human freedom and the Dual Sources Account. Amazon link to Dr. Grant's book: https://www.amazon.com/Free-Will-Gods-Universal-Causality/dp/1350203653/ref=sr_1_1?crid=3LU8U1F0F33LA&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.yPOEXNqMWQnSZ0anoQnRHA.9BVmBQGe7yInHlYeBwTy1HwtgZGKH8ZaTyRuBDJVxLE&dib_tag=se&keywords=free+will+and+god%27s+universal+causality&qid=1754063323&sprefix=free+will+and+God%27s+univeral%2Caps%2C119&sr=8-1 Link to the paper mentioned in the episode: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11406-024-00790-w

In recent years, an old and largely discarded view of Christ’s atonement has been quietly resurfacing on the internet. Known historically as the Ransom Theory (or the Ransom from Satan Theory) this idea suggests that Jesus died as a payment to Satan in order to free humanity from his grasp. According to this view, as a result of Adam's sin, Satan was given legal and rightful authority over the lost souls of humans. Since Satan had rightful claim, God could not simply exercise his power over him and instead offered the soul of Christ in exchange for the those in captivity to Satan. In this video, Anthony Alberino traces the emergence of the Ransom Theory from its early roots in the Church Fathers to its imaginative retelling in modern times by C.S. Lewis in his The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. Alberino then a biblical critique of the view and makes the case that the Ransom Theory should remain a relic of the past. What you'll learn: What the Ransom Theory is and where it came fromWhy it fails as a biblically faithful theory of the atonementHow Christ and the New Testament writers understood the atonementThe real meaning of the words ransom and redemption as deployed in the New Testament 🔔 Subscribe for more theological and philosophical analysis, biblical teaching, and cultural critique.

Is the universe bereft of meaning, goodness, and purpose? Has modern science revealed to us our ultimate cosmic insignificance? According to the intellectual vision of cosmological nihilism, the answer to these questions is yes. What is the nature of this view? What motivates it? And how has it come to form the background image of Western society? Philosopher Dr. Brian Kemple joins Anthony Alberino to talk about the bleak specter of cosmological nihilism and the need for a true philosophical turn to regain our metaphysical sanity and to reorient our intellectual vision so that we can once again behold the cosmic order and our place within it. Link to the Lyceum Institute: https://lyceum.institute Link to REALITY Journal: https://realityjournal.org Link to purchase Brian's book Introduction to Philosophical Principles: https://www.amazon.com/Introduction-Philosophical-Principles-Physics-Person/dp/B0B92H8ZWN/ref=sr_1_1?crid=1H927YZY69XRB&dib=eyJ2IjoiMSJ9.L76oOvaRuff6LZl6gYpj_a2-1b4_KLTiGVv28Eii-z8.97IXMcaGQUycrDyQwcefez-gbTOnl8Pf7pGj_jRp4OQ&dib_tag=se&keywords=introduction+to+philosophical+principles%2C+kemple&qid=1751135840&sprefix=introduction+to+philosophical+principles%2C+kemple%2Caps%2C116&sr=8-1

In an interview with Tucker Carlson, evolutionary biologist and podcaster Bret Weinstein explains why he does not believe in God. In the is episode, Anthony Alberino critically analyzes Weinstein's case for atheism. Alberino argues that given Weinstein's guiding principle for getting at the truth, he ought to embrace theism and not atheism.