Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Estimated from 32 chart positions in 32 markets.
By chart position
- 🇨🇦CA · Government#23100K to 300K
- 🇦🇺AU · Government#33100K to 300K
- 🇺🇸US · Government#35100K to 300K
- 🇬🇧GB · Government#50100K to 300K
- 🇩🇪DE · Government#5730K to 100K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
444K to 1.4M🎙 ~2x weekly·70 episodes·Last published 1mo ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
887K to 2.7M🇨🇦11%🇦🇺11%🇺🇸11%+29 more - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
355K to 1.1M
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
From 20 epsHost
Recent guests
No guests detected in recent episodes.
Recent episodes
Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.
Apr 29, 2026
1h 00m 20s
Mullin v. Doe
Apr 29, 2026
1h 46m 25s
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I
Apr 28, 2026
1h 57m 16s
Monsanto Company v. Durnell
Apr 27, 2026
1h 14m 15s
Chatrie v. United States
Apr 27, 2026
2h 00m 27s
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4/29/26 | Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.✨ | patent lawgeneric drugs+3 | — | Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc.Amarin Pharma, Inc. | U.S. | Hikma PharmaceuticalsAmarin Pharma+4 | — | 1h 00m 20s | |
| 4/29/26 | Mullin v. Doe✨ | Supreme CourtTemporary Protected Status+3 | — | Trump administration | Syrian | Supreme CourtMullin v. Doe+3 | — | 1h 46m 25s | |
| 4/28/26 | Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I✨ | legal caseSupreme Court+3 | — | Cisco Systems, Inc.Doe I+2 | — | Cisco SystemsDoe I+5 | — | 1h 57m 16s | |
| 4/27/26 | Monsanto Company v. Durnell✨ | Supreme Courtlegal case+3 | — | Monsanto CompanyEPA+1 | — | MonsantoDurnell+5 | — | 1h 14m 15s | |
| 4/27/26 | Chatrie v. United States✨ | geofence warrantFourth Amendment+3 | — | United StatesFourth Amendment | — | Chatrie v. United Statesgeofence warrant+4 | — | 2h 00m 27s | |
| 4/22/26 | Blanche v. Lau✨ | lawimmigration+3 | — | U.S. Supreme CourtOyez | United States | lawful permanent residentremoval+3 | — | 1h 29m 33s | |
| 4/21/26 | Federal Communications Commission v. AT&T, Inc.✨ | Supreme CourtCommunications Act+3 | — | Federal Communications CommissionAT&T, Inc.+1 | — | Federal Communications CommissionAT&T+3 | — | 1h 24m 32s | |
| 4/20/26 | Sripetch v. SEC✨ | Supreme CourtSEC+3 | — | SECSripetch v. SEC | — | Supreme CourtSEC+3 | — | 1h 10m 56s | |
| 4/20/26 | T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation✨ | Rooker-Feldman doctrinestate court decisions+3 | — | University of Maryland Medical System CorporationU.S. Supreme Court | — | Rooker-Feldmanstate court+4 | — | 1h 01m 56s | |
| 4/1/26 | Trump v. Barbara✨ | birthright citizenshipExecutive Orders+3 | — | U.S. Supreme CourtOyez+3 | United States | Trump v. Barbarabirthright citizenship+5 | — | 2h 08m 30s | |
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 3/31/26 | Pitchford v. Cain✨ | habeas lawracial bias+3 | — | Mississippi Supreme CourtU.S. Supreme Court | — | Pitchford v. CainMississippi Supreme Court+5 | — | 1h 49m 42s | |
| 3/30/26 | Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties✨ | jurisdictionarbitration+3 | — | U.S. Supreme CourtAndre Balazs Properties | — | jurisdictionarbitration+5 | — | 55m 18s | |
| 3/30/26 | Abouammo v. United States✨ | venuelegal conduct+3 | — | United States | — | venueSupreme Court+5 | — | 1h 17m 56s | |
| 3/25/26 | Flower Foods, Inc. v. Brock✨ | labor lawarbitration+3 | — | Flower Foods, Inc.Brock+2 | — | Flower FoodsBrock+5 | — | 1h 18m 17s | |
| 3/25/26 | Flowers Foods, Inc. v. Brock | A case in which the Court held that a worker who handles goods on a purely intrastate (within one state) leg of a broader interstate journey qualifies for the Federal Arbitration Act's (FAA) §1 exemption, even if the worker never personally crosses state lines or loads and unloads vehicles that do. | — | ||||||
| 3/24/26 | Keathley v. Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated✨ | judicial estoppelbankruptcy+3 | — | Buddy Ayers Construction, Incorporated | — | judicial estoppelbankruptcy filings+3 | — | 1h 09m 29s | |
| 3/24/26 | Noem v. Al Otro Lado✨ | immigrationasylum+3 | — | U.S. Supreme CourtImmigration and Nationality Act | United StatesMexico | Noem v. Al Otro Ladoasylum+3 | — | 1h 21m 19s | |
| 3/23/26 | Watson v. Republican National Committee✨ | election lawfederal statutes+4 | — | Republican National Committee2 U.S.C. § 7+2 | federalstate | Watson v. Republican National Committeefederal election-day statutes+4 | — | 2h 08m 08s | |
| 3/4/26 | Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC✨ | Supreme Courtlegal preemption+3 | — | Caribe Transport II, LLC49 U.S.C. § 14501(c) | U.S. | Supreme CourtMontgomery+7 | — | 1h 39m 50s | |
| 3/3/26 | Hunter v. United States✨ | appeal waiverineffective assistance of counsel+3 | — | U.S. Supreme CourtOyez | United States | appeal waiverineffective assistance+3 | — | 1h 35m 15s | |
| 3/2/26 | United States v. Hemani | A case in which the Court will decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(3), which prohibits the possession of firearms by a person who “is an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance,” violates the Second Amendment as applied to the respondent. | — | ||||||
| 2/25/26 | Pung v. Isabella County | A case in which the Court will decide (1) whether taking and selling a home to satisfy a debt to the government, and keeping the surplus value as a windfall, violates the Takings Clause of the Fifth Amendment when the compensation is based on the artificially depressed auction sale price rather than the property's fair market value, and (2) whether the government’s forfeiture of real property whose value significantly exceeds the tax debt constitutes an excessive fine under the Eighth Amendment, particularly when the tax debt itself was disputed. | — | ||||||
| 2/24/26 | Enbridge Energy, LP v. Nessel | A case in which the Court held that the thirty-day deadline for moving a lawsuit from state court to federal court is a mandatory rule that judges cannot extend for fairness reasons. | — | ||||||
| 2/23/26 | Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. | A case in which the Court held that under Title III of the Cuban Liberty and Democratic Solidarity Act, a company that once held any property interest in physical property that Cuba confiscated can sue anyone who later "traffics" in — that is, knowingly uses or commercially benefits from — that physical property, even if the company's original interest in it would have expired before the trafficking occurred. | — | ||||||
| 2/23/26 | Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Corporación Cimex, S.A. (Cuba) | A case in which the Court will decide whether the Helms-Burton Act grants U.S. courts jurisdiction over Cuban government agencies and instrumentalities sued for “trafficking” in confiscated property, even if the lawsuit does not satisfy one of the exceptions to immunity provided by the earlier, general Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA)? | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 70
Sponsor Intelligence
Sign in to see which brands sponsor this podcast, their ad offers, and promo codes.
Similar Audience Demographics
Podcasts that attract a similar listener profile
Supreme Court Oral Arguments
scotusstats.com
Divided Argument
Will Baude & Dan Epps
Advisory Opinions
The Dispatch
We the People
National Constitution Center
Amarica's Constitution
Akhil Reed Amar
Bloomberg Law
Bloomberg
Law Talk With Epstein, Yoo & Cooke
The Civitas Institute at the University of Texas at Austin
Chart Positions
32 placements across 32 markets.
Chart Positions
32 placements across 32 markets.