About this episode
Legal scholar Annabel Brett discusses the concept of moral possibility and its implications for legal obligation and political agency.
Legal scholar Annabel Brett explores the idea of “moral possibility”—the boundary between what laws demand and what people can realistically or ethically be expected to do. Drawing from early modern thinkers like Aquinas, Suarez, and Hobbes, Brett shows how moral impossibility has long shaped debates about legal obligation, resistance, and political agency. Commentators Melissa Lane and David Dyzenhaus join the discussion, examining how this concept applies to everything from climate action and military conscription to unjust regimes and democratic norms. Together, they highlight how institutions, customs, and time shape the space between legal duty and human capacity—and why recognizing this gap is vital to both justice and legitimacy. Series: "UC Berkeley Graduate Lectures" [Public Affairs] [Humanities] [Show ID: 40431]
People in this episode
Guests: Melissa Lane, David Dyzenhaus
Topics covered
- moral possibility
- legal obligation
- political agency
- climate action
- military conscription
- unjust regimes
- democratic norms
Keywords
- Aquinas
- Suarez
- Hobbes
- justice
- legitimacy
More episodes of UC Berkeley (Video)
- Is This Your Only Life? · April 17, 2026 · 1h 20m
- Three Ages and Three Intelligences: Exploit Explore Empower with Alison Gopnik · February 18, 2026 · 1h 17m
- Can a Liberal Polity Survive the Politics of Grievance? · February 11, 2026 · 1h 24m
- The Squiggly Line with Katelyn Jetelina · January 3, 2026 · 41 min
- The Soul – Spirit is My Altar with Marta Moreno Vega · December 20, 2025 · 56 min
- Public Health: How to Make the Invisible Visible with Katelyn Jetelina · December 15, 2025 · 1h 13m
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the UC Berkeley (Video) podcast page.