A Flaw of Analytic Philosophy

A Flaw of Analytic Philosophy

From Walter Veit Podcast by Walter Veit

February 13, 2026 · 12 min

About this episode

Walter Veit discusses the challenges and future of analytic philosophy and introduces naturalistic philosophy as a successor paradigm.

Click on the video above if you want to listen to this essay in my German accent or simply scroll below to read it. A few weeks ago, I published an essay on Substack titled The End of Analytic Philosophy . In it, I agreed with Liam Kofi Bright that analytic philosophy has perhaps come close to becoming a degenerating research programme, leaving even many of its practitioners with a pessimistic outlook on its future. But the post was not at all meant to be depressing, for I offered a successor paradigm: naturalistic philosophy. A philosophy strongly continuous with, and often collaborative with, the sciences in order to make progress on our field’s most pressing problems. I was a bit worried about coming out as a ‘non-analytic philosopher’, since most of my peers happily use the label of analytic philosopher for themselves. I was therefore happy to see the overwhelmingly positive reactions that made my essay go somewhat viral on substack and gained me a ton of new subscribers. However, this also brought with it a new bar for my writing, making me go from an experimental week of daily posts to much less frequent posts. Now, I had a good excuse, since I was committed to several…

People in this episode

Host: Walter Veit

Topics covered

  • analytic philosophy
  • naturalistic philosophy
  • science collaboration
  • philosophical paradigms
  • writing challenges

Keywords

  • analytic philosophy
  • naturalistic philosophy
  • Liam Kofi Bright
  • writing
  • Substack

Mentioned in this episode

Books & works: The End of Analytic Philosophy

More episodes of Walter Veit Podcast

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Walter Veit Podcast podcast page.