Since Most People Are Wrong When They Make Supernatural Claims, Why Didn't God Do Better?

Since Most People Are Wrong When They Make Supernatural Claims, Why Didn't God Do Better?

From Risen Jesus by Mike Licona

September 17, 2025 · 1h 46m

About this episode

Dr. Matthew McCormick argues against the historical evidence for Jesus' resurrection, while Dr. Michael Licona defends it in a debate.

Dr. Matthew McCormick, a philosophy professor at California State University, Sacramento, doesn’t believe that there is satisfactory historical evidence to support the idea that Jesus rose from the dead. This is because humans have a high error rate when making claims about the supernatural. Therefore, those who reported Jesus’ post-death appearances were likely wrong. Furthermore, if an all-powerful God wanted people to believe this claim, why didn’t he provide more substantial evidence for us? Why didn’t he do better? In a 2016 debate at Sacramento State University, Dr. Michael Licona faces these contentions from McCormick, arguing that evidence strongly supports theism over atheism and that the existing historical data suggests that Jesus did rise from the death. Which case do you think is better?

People in this episode

Hosts: Mike Licona, Dr. Michael Licona

Guest: Dr. Matthew McCormick

Topics covered

  • supernatural claims
  • historical evidence
  • theism vs atheism
  • Jesus' resurrection
  • philosophy
  • debate

Keywords

  • supernatural
  • historical evidence
  • Jesus
  • resurrection
  • theism
  • atheism
  • debate

Mentioned in this episode

Organizations: California State University, Sacramento

More episodes of Risen Jesus

Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Risen Jesus podcast page.