
Training Data
by Sequoia Capital
Is this your podcast?On the show
From 33 epsHosts
Recent guests
Recent episodes
David Silver and Lasse Espeholt of Ineffable Intelligence: A Superlearner for the Age of Experience
Oct 13, 2026
1h 08m 02s
Google's AI Infrastructure Chief, Amin Vahdat, on the Physics & Economics of Frontier AI
Oct 6, 2026
1h 04m 26s
Box's Aaron Levie: On Reinventing Yourself in the AI Age and Enterprise Diffusion
Sep 15, 2026
1h 05m 21s
Making Cities Awesome: Peregrine’s Nick Noone & Ben Rudolph
Sep 1, 2026
52m 27s
Parallel’s Parag Agrawal: Building a New Web for AI Agents
Aug 25, 2026
55m 18s
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Blended from 1 signal.
Built from
By chart position
- 🇺🇸United States · TechnologyHOME#1069.0K to 56K
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom · Technology#101688 to 4.3K
- 🇳🇬NG · Technology#17505 to 3.2K
- 🇮🇳India · Technology#102482 to 3.0K
- 🇲🇽Mexico · Technology#101344 to 2.1K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
13K to 82K🎙 ~2x weekly·108 episodes·Last published 5d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
26K to 164K🇺🇸69%🇬🇧5%🇳🇬4%+10 more - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
10K to 66K
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/13/26 | David Silver and Lasse Espeholt of Ineffable Intelligence: A Superlearner for the Age of Experience | David Silver spent two years building AlphaGo on human data. When he removed human data altogether building AlphaGo Zero, the AI surpassed AlphaGo in under two days. He left DeepMind to run that same bet in pursuit of superintelligence. David and Lasse Espeholt, co-founders of Ineffable Intelligence, explain their plan to build a “superlearner”—an agent that starts knowing nothing and discovers science, mathematics, and language for itself by direct experience instead of through a pre-training run. Silver argues that human-language reasoning is a ceiling, not a foundation, that alignment via chain-of-thought monitoring is already reaching its limits, and that the science of how superintelligences coexist should be worked out in simulation before anything touches the real world. Espeholt describes the GPU cluster and the lineage from IMPALA and SEED RL that makes the experiment possible. Silver’s forecast: strong evidence within a year, superintelligence in three. Hosted by Sonya Huang, Sequoia Capital 0:00 – Introduction 1:09 – What held true from Go to today, and what the LLM era changed 3:35 – Why leave DeepMind to start a new lab 5:58 – Why "Ineffable" (and the secret second reason) 7:03 – Lasse's path: scaling RL at DeepMind and Google Brain 9:31 – Defining a super learner and first contact 12:35 – Super learners vs. LLMs that make discoveries 13:59 – Day to day: the RL stack, crucibles and human-journey milestones 16:13 – Don't breadcrumb the objective: simple rewards, emergent complexity 21:16 – What a crucible looks like 24:14 – Go: one agent is boring, two is infinite 25:41 – Will agents rediscover language? 27:22 – Removing human priors: AlphaGo to AlphaZero 32:05 – Keeping human bias out of the crucibles 33:35 – Confidence, timing and super forecasting 36:24 – Is compute the driver? 38:13 – The ceiling on simulation and Rich Sutton's objection 43:44 – Alignment and the science of superintelligence 47:45 – Monitoring agents that don't think in English 51:01 – Pacing the frontier 52:54 – The compute setup: Vera Rubin on GCP 55:18 – Training, inference, simulation and RL scaling laws 57:40 – IMPALA and SEED RL 1:00:58 – 20 people and the compute-per-person ratio 1:04:49 – A research-led culture 1:05:47 – Predictions | 1h 08m 02s | ||||||
| 10/6/26 | Google's AI Infrastructure Chief, Amin Vahdat, on the Physics & Economics of Frontier AI | At 100,000-accelerator scale, something fails multiple times an hour, which is why Google's Chief Technologist for AI Infrastructure Amin Vahdat thinks FLOPS is a vanity metric. The metric that matters is what he calls goodput: the useful work a workload actually delivers through real failures. Amin walks through the calculus that split the TPU line into 8i and 8t for the first time, why the TPU's core primitives haven't changed since v1, and how Google and DeepMind co-design in the same rooms, intercepting chip architectures mid-flight before tape-out. He explains why long-horizon agents are sending demand for CPUs and storage through the roof alongside accelerators, how optical circuit switches reroute light to a spare rack in milliseconds, and why Google would rather wait on a utility than build its own gigawatt. We also cover orbital data centers and the multi-megawatt rack of 2036. Hosted by Sonya Huang, Sequoia Capital 0:00 – Introduction 1:47 – What makes a data center an AI data center 5:30 – Goodput, not FLOPS: holding yourself accountable when something fails every hour 11:52 – Doubling token capacity every six months, and where the gains actually come from 15:32 – The TPU bet: from a contrarian call in 2013 to splitting 8i and 8t 23:30 – The case for and against co-design 26:11 – Shoulder to shoulder with DeepMind: intercepting chips mid-flight 34:16 – Long-horizon agents change the shape of the data center 37:50 – Optical circuit switching and the state of networking 42:35 – Power is the binding constraint: utilities, gigawatts, and sizing a data center 49:23 – Training vs. serving clusters, seven-year-old TPUs, and open standards 58:29 – Orbital data centers and the supercomputer of 2036 | 1h 04m 26s | ||||||
| 9/15/26 | Box's Aaron Levie: On Reinventing Yourself in the AI Age and Enterprise Diffusion | Starting a company is hard. Reinventing your company for AI as a public company with quarterly earnings results is even harder. Aaron Levie has pulled off the transition with Box and offers hard-won advice for founders. The cofounder and CEO of Box argues the value isn't only in the model; it's in the bridge from a model's raw capability to the actual workflow inside a bank, a law firm, or a pharma company. That's the case for the application layer, and Box is building it: an agent harness tuned so tightly to its own file system, permissions, and search that it beats handing the raw API to Claude or ChatGPT on both accuracy and latency. Aaron explains why token subsidies from the labs can't last, why you want a model-agnostic company routing your tokens rather than the one selling them, and why coding diffused fast while the rest of knowledge work won't. (There's no "give us your GitHub" for a sales rep.) His prediction: within five years, 90% of enterprise tokens go to work no human user ever initiated. Hosted by Sonya Huang, Sequoia Capital 0:00 – Introduction 1:55 – Are application companies the hottest neolabs? 6:56 – Will the labs move up the stack? 12:34 – Box and betting the company on AI 16:50 – Hero use cases: reading a million contracts and long-running agents 18:42 – Work slop: why AI code is embraced but AI content isn't 24:08 – Building Box's agentic harness and the evals that matter 27:23 – The state of the model race 29:25 – Open-weight model adoption in the enterprise 32:34 – Memory, continual learning, and what belongs in the weights 37:29 – Box Labs and systems of record in a world of agents 44:55 – Will chat be the dominant UI for enterprise AI? 48:00 – Why coding diffused fast and the rest of knowledge work hasn't 54:31 – Staying wired in, making a company AI-first, and what it takes to win | 1h 05m 21s | ||||||
| 9/1/26 | public safety technologydata sovereignty+4 | Nick NooneBen Rudolph | PeregrineSan Pablo PD+2 | Wisconsinsynagogue | public safetydata access+5 | — | 52m 27s | ||
| 8/25/26 | AI agentsweb search+4 | Parag Agrawal | Parallel Web SystemsTwitter+3 | United States | AI agentsweb search+5 | — | 55m 18s | ||
| 8/18/26 | reinforcement learningAI models+4 | Rich SuttonKhurram Javed | Oak LabThe Bitter Lesson | — | AIreinforcement learning+5 | — | 53m 43s | ||
| 8/4/26 | drug designbiotechnology+4 | Josh MeierMatt McPartlon | Chai Discoverypharma industry | — | drug discoveryChai-2+5 | — | 47m 22s | ||
| 7/29/26 | AGIautomation+4 | Jerry TworekRohan Anil | OpenAICore Automation+1 | — | AGIreinforcement learning+5 | — | 49m 11s | ||
| 7/21/26 | autonomous coding agentssoftware development+3 | Matan Grinberg | GLMFactory+2 | — | autonomous codingdark factory+3 | — | 51m 31s | ||
| 7/14/26 | developer platformopen ecosystem+4 | Katelyn LesseAngela Jiang | AnthropicModal+2 | — | Anthropicdeveloper platform+4 | — | 48m 54s | ||
| 7/7/26 | autonomous systemsdrone delivery+3 | Keller Rinaudo ClifftonEric Watson | ZiplineState Department | Rwanda | Ziplineautonomous delivery+7 | — | 55m 18s | ||
| 6/30/26 | AIhardware-software co-design+4 | Dylan Patel | InferenceXSemiAnalysis+4 | neoclouds | AI performancehardware optimization+6 | — | 1h 10m 14s | ||
| 6/24/26 | memorycontinual learning+4 | Dan BidermanJessy Lin | EngramMicrosoft+2 | — | memorycontinual learning+5 | — | 44m 51s | ||
| 6/16/26 | superintelligencehuman simulation+4 | Joon Sung Park | SimileStanford+1 | — | superintelligencehuman behavior+5 | — | 38m 45s | ||
| 6/11/26 | AItechnology+4 | Logan Kilpatrick | GoogleGoogle AI Studio+4 | — | AIagent harnesses+5 | — | 51m 09s | ||
| 6/10/26 | AItechnology shift+3 | Jensen Huang | NVIDIASiemens | — | NVIDIAAI factories+3 | — | 41m 20s | ||
| 6/2/26 | customer insightsAI technology+3 | Alfred Wahlforss | Listen LabsMicrosoft+6 | — | AI agentcustomer interviews+3 | — | 40m 22s | ||
| 5/26/26 | machine learningdistributed infrastructure+3 | Federico CassanoDmytro Dzhulgakov | CursorFireworks+1 | — | ComposerCursor+5 | — | 45m 33s | ||
| 5/19/26 | AIenterprise software+3 | Jake Stauch | ServalOpenAI+2 | — | AI ageenterprise software+3 | — | 38m 23s | ||
| 5/13/26 | music creationtechnology in music+3 | Mikey Shulman | SunoWarner+2 | — | music platformsSuno+5 | — | 34m 48s | ||
| 5/8/26 | audio AIvoice interface+3 | Mati Staniszewski | ElevenLabsSequoia Capital | — | audio AIvoice interface+5 | — | 26m 48s | ||
| 5/5/26 | codingAI+3 | Boris Cherny | Anthropic | — | Claude Codecoding+3 | — | 24m 35s | ||
| 5/4/26 | autonomous vehiclesWaymo+4 | Dmitri Dolgov | WaymoSequoia Capital+1 | eleven cities | Waymoautonomous rides+6 | — | 27m 15s | ||
| 5/1/26 | AIhuman attention+4 | Greg Brockman | OpenAISequoia Capital | — | OpenAIGreg Brockman+4 | — | 28m 26s | ||
| 4/30/26 | Artificial General IntelligenceDrug Discovery+4 | Demis Hassabis | Google DeepMindAlphaFold | — | AGIDeepMind+7 | — | 26m 51s | ||
| 4/30/26 | vibe codingagentic engineering+4 | Andrej Karpathy | OpenAITesla+2 | — | vibe codingagentic engineering+6 | — | 29m 48s | ||
| 4/14/26 | AI marketingSEO+3 | James Cadwallader | GeminiChatGPT+2 | — | AI agentsmarketing history+3 | — | 31m 26s | ||
| 3/24/26 | autonomous labsscientific research+3 | Jason Kelly | Ginkgo BioworksOpenAI | — | autonomous labsscientific research+5 | — | 58m 27s | ||
| 3/17/26 | data centersspace infrastructure+4 | Philip Johnston | StarcloudSpaceX | — | data centersspace+5 | — | 44m 19s | ||
| 3/10/26 | hardware engineeringAI+3 | Cameron McCordJason Hoch+1 | NominalSpaceX+3 | — | hardware testingAI companies+3 | — | 40m 55s | ||
| 2/10/26 | AI developmentReinforcement Learning+3 | Will BrownJohannes Hagemann | Prime IntellectSequoia Capital | — | AIReinforcement Learning+4 | — | 44m 45s | ||
| 2/3/26 | Vertical SaaSAGI+4 | Jamie Cuffe | PaceSequoia Capital+1 | insurance | Vertical SaaSAGI+5 | — | 51m 55s | ||
| 1/27/26 | terminal modernizationcoding agents+4 | Zach Lloyd | WarpAnthropic+1 | — | terminalAI+5 | — | 48m 03s | ||
| 1/21/26 | AI agentscontext engineering+4 | Harrison Chase | LangChainSequoia Capital | — | AIagents+6 | — | 39m 47s | ||
| 1/14/26 | AIchip design+3 | Anna GoldieAzalia Mirhoseini | GoogleRicursive Intelligence | — | AIchip design+5 | — | 36m 59s | ||
| 1/6/26 | roboticsartificial intelligence+3 | Karol HausmanTobi Springenberg | Physical IntelligenceSequoia Capital | — | roboticsfoundation models+3 | — | 1h 01m 37s | ||
Showing 36 of 108
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Similar Audience Demographics
Podcasts that attract a similar listener profile
Chart history for Training Data
Peaked at #17 in NG, currently #17 in NG.
| Market | Genre | Peak | Current | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NG | — | #17 | #17 | — |
| GR | — | #21 | #21 | — |
| AE | — | #48 | #48 | — |
| Sweden | — | #52 | #52 | — |
| HU | — | #67 | #67 | — |
| KE | — | #78 | #78 | — |
| HK | — | #79 | #79 | — |
| SA | — | #98 | #98 | — |
| United Kingdom | — | #101 | #101 | — |
| Mexico | — | #101 | #101 | — |
| India | — | #102 | #102 | — |
| South Korea | — | #103 | #103 | — |
| United States | — | #106 | #106 | — |
| Australia | — | #112 | #112 | — |
| PE | — | #114 | #114 | — |
| IS | — | #118 | #118 | — |
| CH | — | #122 | #122 | — |
| New Zealand | — | #123 | #123 | — |
| France | — | #127 | #127 | — |
| TW | — | #132 | #132 | — |
Chart Positions
29 placements across 29 markets.
Chart Positions
29 placements across 29 markets.