Hidden Killers Live! Daily True Crime News & Breakdowns

The Nancy Guthrie case may have a written confession, a compromised investigation, and a list of innocent people who've been publicly accused — and somehow it has produced exactly zero arrests. Tony Brueski puts the entire legal picture in one place.Joining this legal breakdown are former prosecutor Eric Faddis and retired FBI agent Robin Dreeke.It opens with the note. Sent to a Tucson television station, asking for no money, kept quiet by investigators for months, it reads less like a ransom demand than an account of how this ended. Tony breaks down whether a message like that can anchor a murder case with no body, and how felony-murder law could let prosecutors win without ever proving anyone meant for the 84-year-old mother of Savannah Guthrie to die.Then the defense side. The sheriff who led the search is staring down a perjury referral to the state Attorney General. The scene was loose enough for a reporter to reach the front door. Searches were called off, DNA pointed at an innocent man, and the FBI says it was shut out early. Tony explains how a defense attorney turns each of those into reasonable doubt — and whether the pile is already deep enough to free the right person.And then the wreckage: a cleared family still called killers, an innocent teacher accused online, and a sheriff telling him to sue when no one ever does. Tony lays out the defamation roads, the reason they so rarely get traveled, and where citizen journalism becomes something chargeable.One case. Three fronts. And a confession that, so far, changed nothing.Full conversation inside.END_LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags: #NancyGuthrie #SavannahGuthrie #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #NoBodyHomicide #Perjury #Defamation #Tucson #PimaCounty #FelonyMurder

How much red meat is on the bone for a defense attorney in the Nancy Guthrie case? More than anyone should be comfortable with — and not one suspect has even been named yet.It's a legal breakdown with defense attorney Eric Faddis and retired FBI special agent Robin Dreeke.Tony Brueski runs the defense playbook on the investigation into the disappearance of Savannah Guthrie's 84-year-old mother. The headline problem is the sheriff who led it: a man now facing a perjury referral from his own county over what he said under oath about his record. When the official at the center of a case has his own credibility in front of the state Attorney General, every report, every search, and every piece of evidence his department handled gets a question mark next to it.Then come the rest of the cracks. The scene that was never really secured. The searches that were called off. The glove DNA that led to the wrong person. The fight between local investigators and the FBI over who tested what, and where. Tony explains which of these a defense attorney can turn into suppressed evidence, which become pure reasonable doubt, and whether the combination has already done damage that can't be undone.He's blunt about the stakes, too. This isn't a thought experiment. If the failures are bad enough, they don't just threaten a weak case — they can sink a strong one, and they can do it for a person who actually did it.The most unsettling question in this whole case isn't who took Nancy. It's whether the people looking for her have already made it possible for the right person to walk free.Full conversation inside.END_LINKS:Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodDisclaimer:This publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.Hashtags: #NancyGuthrie #ChrisNanos #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #PimaCounty #Perjury #CriminalDefense #ReasonableDoubt #Tucson #SavannahGuthrie

Barry Morphew faces first-degree murder charges in Suzanne Morphew’s death for the second time — and what he allegedly did between prosecutions is now part of the behavioral record heading into an October trial.After the first case collapsed and the original prosecutor was disbarred, Barry relocated to Arizona under multiple aliases. He lived in a trailer park, went by different names depending on who he was talking to, and denied his own identity when a woman at a bar recognized him. All of this happened while investigators were finding Suzanne’s body in a shallow grave and pulling a wildlife tranquilizer from her bones that prosecutors say only Barry had a prescription for.Then came the paperwork. After posting $3 million bond on the new charges, Barry allegedly signed forms authorizing the cremation of Suzanne’s remains — remains that contain the prosecution’s most critical forensic evidence. An undersheriff collecting the body from the funeral home learned it was set to be cremated the following day. Prosecutors say Barry signed the authorization and paid for it.His lawyers say he takes no position. Twelve jurors will have their own.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#BarryMorphew #SuzanneMorphew #HiddenKillersLive #TrueCrime #MorphewTrial #BAMTranquilizer #ColdCase #MurderTrial #JusticeForSuzanne #TrueCrimePodcast

Taylor Parker Maternal Instinct — the people who could have stopped Taylor Parker were told by the system they weren't allowed to.Her OB-GYN performed the hysterectomy. He watched her steal ultrasound images from his office and post them on social media claiming she was pregnant. He knew it was a medical impossibility. Privacy laws meant the strongest statement anyone at that clinic could make when asked directly was "just go with your gut." Five words. That's what the system allowed.Taylor's father Mark Morton walked into the gender reveal party knowing his daughter could not be pregnant. He watched the whole performance and left in silence. Taylor's mother Shona told the court she never confronted Taylor because she assumed the lie would collapse on its own. Her aunt tried to warn people and was blocked on every platform.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott examines the system that failed Reagan Hancock in this conversation. Not the person who committed the crime — the infrastructure around the crime. The laws that silenced the doctor. The family psychology that turned a shared secret into a shared inaction. The pandemic that handed Taylor nine months of unverifiable cover.And the question at the center of it all: Stephanie Ott did everything a responsible person is supposed to do when they suspect someone is in danger. She found proof. She made calls. She confronted the deception. The system shut her down at every turn. What does this case say to every person who believes they would have done something to prevent it?Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MaternalInstinct #TaylorParker #HiddenKillersLive #ReaganHancock #ShavaunScott #Netflix #GenderReveal #TrueCrime #WadeGriffin #SystemFailure

Taylor Parker Maternal Instinct — her friends watched her fake a stroke on video, and they bought it. They watched her claim cancer, MS, a brain tumor, and they believed every word. Long before the fake pregnancy, Taylor Parker was already deep into a pattern of fabricated emergencies — and the people around her never suspected a thing.Psychotherapist Shavaun Scott breaks down the psychology of someone who lies at this scale. Not one lie. Not a single moment of desperation. A sustained campaign of deception stretching years — across multiple partners, multiple friendships, and multiple medical fabrications — all leading to the crime that landed Taylor Parker on death row in Texas.The conversation puts Taylor's entire history under the lens: the fixation on her friend's real pregnancy before she faked her own, the brother who testified that her personality transformed after weight loss surgery, and the question no one watching the Netflix documentary seems to be asking — was there ever a point where someone could have identified the pattern and intervened? Or did Taylor Parker become so practiced at deception that even trained professionals wouldn't have seen it coming?What Shavaun Scott sees in this case — and what she says about the line between calculated performance and something deeper — goes beyond anything the documentary covers.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#MaternalInstinct #TaylorParker #HiddenKillersLive #ReaganHancock

The prosecution’s most powerful storytelling tool just got taken away. Twelve and a half hours of financial crimes testimony painted Alex Murdaugh as a desperate thief who would do anything to keep his world from collapsing. The South Carolina Supreme Court said it was too much, too inflammatory, and went far beyond what was needed to establish motive. The retrial has to be “efficient” with no inflammatory detail of limited probative value.That changes the entire shape of the case. The prosecution’s physical evidence has always been circumstantial. No weapon. No confession. No eyewitness. The kennel video and Alex’s lie about being at the scene are the anchors. But the first time around, those anchors sat inside a narrative about a man who stole from disabled clients and defrauded his own law partners. That context made everything feel inevitable. Without it, the jury has to reach guilty on the physical case with far less emotional ammunition.The AG is also floating the death penalty for the first time, and the defense is claiming statistics favor acquittal on retrial. Both sides are already fighting over timeline, venue, and who testifies. Bob Motta on whether the prosecution can still get a conviction. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Bob Motta.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #CreightonWaters #MurdaughRetrial #SouthCarolina #BobMotta #DefenseDiaries #MaggieMurdaugh #AttorneyGeneral #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

Becky Hill told jurors to “watch his body language” and “don’t be fooled.” She wanted a guilty verdict because she was writing a book. She pleaded guilty. She got probation. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction. That chapter is closed. But the defense opened a new one.Five days after the ruling, Jim Griffin asked publicly whether Hill was a “lone wolf.” Then the defense filed a federal civil rights lawsuit against her for six hundred thousand dollars. A federal suit gives the defense something the murder case never did — the power to put people under oath and make them answer questions about what they knew and when they knew it. The defense can reach beyond Hill herself and pull in anyone connected to the courthouse during the first trial.That’s the play. If depositions reveal that someone else in the building knew what Hill was doing and let it happen, the defense walks into the retrial with a narrative that goes far beyond one bad actor. It becomes a story about a system that let a man get convicted unfairly. And if the suit settles before trial, those depositions never happen. Bob Motta on what’s really at stake. Tony Brueski, Robin Dreeke, and Bob Motta.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AlexMurdaugh #BeckyHill #MurdaughRetrial #FederalLawsuit #BobMotta #Def

Listener-driven. Evidence-grounded. Three cases the audience won’t let go of — and the questions that cut through the noise.On Nancy Guthrie, the audience found something investigators haven’t addressed: a neighbor with a vault full of gems and minerals, and a Google Maps pin that overlaps with Nancy’s home. The wrong-house theory has been circulating for months. Robin Dreeke, retired FBI behavioral analyst, examines what a mistaken-target home invasion actually looks like and whether forty-five minutes inside the house fits that profile.On Rex Heuermann, Asa Ellerup told documentary cameras she moved into the basement room where Rex confessed to killing seven women — and that it’s spiritual. She’s visited him in jail a dozen times since his confession. The family reportedly took seven figures from Peacock. Robin addresses what the behavioral record tells us about loyalty, denial, and the gap in New York’s Son of Sam law that made the payout legal.On Mackenzie Shirilla, prosecutors decoded a private language Mackenzie and Natalie created to evade prison monitoring. Steve lost his job after Netflix. Natalie called the Russo family evil. Mackenzie’s first concern from jail was her belongings. Robin examines what the parent-child dynamic tells us about who built Mackenzie — and who’s still running the show from the outside.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#NancyGuthrie #RexHeuermann #MackenzieShirilla #RobinDreeke #FBI #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ListenerQA #AsaEllerup #NatalieShirilla

Rex Heuermann pleaded guilty to eight murders. His ex-wife and children reportedly received over a million dollars from a Peacock documentary about the case. The families of the women he killed received nothing. New York has a Son of Sam law. It doesn’t apply here — because the current version only covers the convicted person, not their family. Lawmakers have pushed to close that gap since 2023. The bills have not passed.That’s one of the questions the audience brought. The others go deeper. Asa Ellerup gutted the basement where Rex admitted to dismembering seven women, redecorated it, and moved in. She told documentary cameras it was a spiritual gesture. She has continued visiting Rex in jail. Victoria Heuermann says she believes her father most likely did it. Same information, same household, completely different responses.Robin Dreeke spent decades analyzing human behavior for the FBI. He joins Tony Brueski to walk through the listener questions that hit hardest — from the kill room to the documentary money to the DNA evidence linking the household to all seven victims’ remains. What does loyalty look like after a confession? What does denial look like when the evidence is sitting on the kitchen table? The audience asked. Robin answers.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/ Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1 Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/ Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod X Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #AsaEllerup #GilgoBeach #SonOfSamLaw #PeacockDocumentary #RobinDreeke #FBI #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime #ListenerQA

Three of the most followed cases in the country moved at the same time. Rex Heuermann stood in a Suffolk County courtroom and heard the judge call him disgusting, despicable, and a coward before handing down the maximum sentence. His plea deal includes FBI Behavioral Analysis Unit cooperation — and a phone call he allegedly made to one of his victims’ family members after the murder tells you what kind of person the FBI is about to sit across from.Timothy Hudson, the sixteen-year-old charged in Anna Kepner’s death aboard a Carnival cruise ship, was ordered into federal custody after the judge who released him reversed his own decision. The language in the detention order goes far beyond standard pretrial concern. Sealed evidence was filed two days before. Anna’s family had reportedly been warned about Hudson’s behavior months before the cruise.And Nancy Guthrie — eighty-four, no known crypto — had her alleged abduction classified as a crypto-targeted crime by CertiK. If the attackers had the wrong address, the intended target may still be nearby. Jennifer Coffindaffer, contributor to Hidden Killers, walks through all three cases in one conversation.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #AnnaKepner #NancyGuthrie #GilgoBeach #TimothyHudson #CertiK #FBI #JenniferCoffindaffer #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime

Melissa Barthelemy was twenty-four years old when Rex Heuermann strangled her to death. Her remains were found near Gilgo Beach on Long Island. And according to testimony delivered at Heuermann’s sentencing, what Heuermann did after the murder may tell investigators more about him than the killing itself.Heuermann was sentenced to consecutive life terms. Judge Mazzei asked if he was even a little bit sorry. Called him a coward. Ordered him removed from the courtroom. The families chanted ogre as he was taken out. But before the sentence, Heuermann agreed to cooperate with the FBI’s Behavioral Analysis Unit as part of his plea deal — a deal that requires him to describe everything he did with total honesty.The hard truth is that Heuermann will enjoy every minute of those sessions. The attention. The expertise directed at understanding him. The FBI knows this. They are doing it anyway because fifty years of sitting across from killers has produced results the public rarely sees. Jennifer Coffindaffer, contributor to Hidden Killers, explains what the BAU expects to learn and why the families may not have heard the last of Rex Heuermann’s crimes.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#RexHeuermann #GilgoBeach #MelissaBarthelemy #FBI #BAU #SerialKiller #JudgeMazzei #Sentencing #TrueCrime #HiddenKillers

The defense asked the trial judge to separate the charges. The judge said no. Five New Hampshire Supreme Court justices — unanimously — said that decision denied Adam Montgomery a fair trial and reversed the second-degree murder conviction in the killing of his five-year-old daughter Harmony.The problem was the evidence gap between the two charges. The July 2019 assault had multiple witnesses, documented injuries, and no dispute. The December 2019 murder rested on Kayla Montgomery — Adam’s estranged wife, who went to prison for lying to investigators before agreeing to testify for the prosecution. The court found the rock-solid assault evidence bled into the weaker murder case and gave the jury a bridge it should never have had. The defense theory — that Kayla killed Harmony and Adam only covered it up — was drowned out by proof of a separate violent act the jury was never supposed to weigh against the murder charge.Criminal defense attorney Bob Motta walks through the ruling with the precision of someone who has tried these cases. He explains what “prejudicial joinder” means when it’s not a legal abstraction but a real courtroom dynamic that tips a verdict. He addresses whether the trial judge should have recognized the risk, why the defense ended up arguing both sides of the severance issue, and what the public gets wrong when they hear “conviction overturned.” Adam Montgomery is not getting out — he still faces decades on surviving convictions plus a thirty-two-and-a-half-year firearms sentence. Prosecutors plan to retry the murder charge. Harmony’s remains have never been found.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#HarmonyMontgomery #AdamMontgomery #HiddenKillersLive #MurderConvictionReversed #BobMotta #NewHampshire #TrueCrime #KaylaMontgomery #JusticeForHarmony #MontgomeryTrial

Anna Kepner’s ex-boyfriend says she was scared of her stepbrother. She slept at friends’ houses to avoid being around him. Hudson’s own step-grandmother went on national television and called the family cruise “a recipe for disaster” — and said the parents should be held accountable. Three teenagers who weren’t raised together were put in a single cabin on a ship in international waters.The question everyone is asking is the one the Crumbley case made possible: can parents be held criminally responsible for what their child allegedly did? The Crumbley parents were convicted for ignoring documented warning signs. The evidence emerging in the Kepner case suggests the warning signs may have been just as clear.But there’s a wall. The Carnival Horizon flies a Panamanian flag. This happened outside any state’s jurisdiction. There is no federal contributing-to-delinquency statute. If there’s no law on the books that covers the parents’ alleged decisions, the comparison to the Crumbleys stops at the courthouse door.Meanwhile, the judge who released Hudson in February just reversed himself. Sealed evidence filed June 8 moved Magistrate Judge Torres to order detention, writing that Hudson could “snap at any time” and that his alleged conduct suggests “a level of psychopathy and lack of remorse.”Retired FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer and Robin Dreeke examine what moved the judge, whether proving Anna was afraid of Hudson changes the legal picture for parental charges, and what the road to trial looks like now that Hudson is behind bars.Timothy Hudson, sixteen, is charged as an adult with first-degree murder. He has pleaded not guilty and is entitled to the presumption of innocence.A look back at the most compelling stories of the week.Join Our SubStack For AD-FREE ADVANCE EPISODES & EXTRAS!: https://hiddenkillers.substack.com/Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video? Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC8-vxmbhTxxG10sO1izODJg?sub_confirmation=1Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspodX Twitter https://x.com/TrueCrimePodThis publication contains commentary and opinion based on publicly available information. All individuals are presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. Nothing published here should be taken as a statement of fact, health or legal advice.#AnnaKepner #TimothyHudson #CruiseShipMurder #CarnivalHorizon #CrumbleyComparison #JusticeForAnna #JenniferCoffindaffer #RobinDreeke #HiddenKillers #TrueCrime