![[25-197] T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation](https://scotusstats.com/podcast/artwork/2025/25-197-88c7fd73b6d4e4063b8fb077538e3991f6333da592bc35ab2f35f4b1a71d5b8c.jpg)
[25-197] T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
From Supreme Court Oral Arguments by scotusstats.com
April 20, 2026 · 1h 2m · Season 2025
About this episode
The episode discusses the case of T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation, focusing on issues of involuntary commitment and due process rights.
T. M. v. University of Maryland Medical System Corporation Justia · Docket · oyez.org Argued on Apr 20, 2026. Petitioner: T. M. Respondent: University of Maryland Medical System Corporation. Advocates: Elizabeth B. Prelogar (for the Petitioner) Lisa S. Blatt (for the Respondents) Facts of the case (from oyez.org) In March 2023, T.M., a woman with a rare medical condition that triggers psychosis upon consuming gluten, was involuntarily committed to Baltimore Washington Medical Center after an episode. Her treating psychiatrist sought and received state approval to forcibly administer antipsychotic medication; T.M. contested this but was unsuccessful in administrative proceedings. Independent psychiatrists later stated that T.M. no longer required inpatient care. To secure her release, T.M. and the hospital negotiated an oral agreement, which was formalized as a state court consent order. The order allowed her to leave the hospital on the condition that she comply with ongoing psychiatric treatment and medications, switch providers, and drop pending lawsuits. Her parents, J.M. and A.M., were also bound to notify authorities if she failed to comply. Ten days later…
People in this episode
Guest: T. M.
Topics covered
- mental health
- legal rights
- due process
- involuntary commitment
- psychiatric treatment
Keywords
- T. M.
- University of Maryland
- involuntary commitment
- due process
- psychiatric treatment
- consent order
- antipsychotic medication
Mentioned in this episode
Organizations: University of Maryland Medical System Corporation
More episodes of Supreme Court Oral Arguments
- [24-889] Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc. · April 29, 2026 · 1h 0m
- [25-1083] Mullin v. Doe · April 29, 2026 · 1h 46m
- [24-856] Cisco Systems, Inc. v. Doe I · April 28, 2026 · 1h 57m
- [25-112] Chatrie v. United States · April 27, 2026 · 2h 0m
- [24-1068] Monsanto Company v. Durnell · April 27, 2026 · 1h 14m
- [25-429] Blanche v. Lau · April 22, 2026 · 1h 30m
Explore listener stats, chart rankings, contacts and more on the Supreme Court Oral Arguments podcast page.