
Insights from recent episode analysis
Audience Interest
Podcast Focus
Publishing Consistency
Platform Reach
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Est. Listeners
Based on iTunes & Spotify (publisher stats).
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
1 - 1,000 - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
1 - 5,000 - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
1 - 500
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
On the show
Recent episodes
23-1122 - Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton - Opinion Announcement - June 27, 2025
Jun 27, 2025
24-297 - Mahmoud v. Taylor - Dissenting Opinion - Sotomayor - June 27, 2025
Jun 27, 2025
24-316 - Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. - Opinion Announcement - June 27, 2025
Jun 27, 2025
24-354 - Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research - Opinion Announcement - June 27, 2025
Jun 27, 2025
24A884 - Trump v. CASA Inc. - Dissenting Opinion - Sotomayor - June 27, 2025
Jun 27, 2025
Social Links & Contact
Official channels & resources
Official Website
Login
RSS Feed
Login
| Date | Episode | Description | Length | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6/27/25 | ![]() 23-1122 - Free Speech Coalition, Inc. v. Paxton - Opinion Announcement - June 27, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that a Texas law that requires any website that publishes content one-third or more of which is “harmful to minors” to verify the age of each of its users before providing access is subject to “intermediate scrutiny,” and the law at issue is constitutional under that test. | — | ||||||
| 6/27/25 | ![]() 24-297 - Mahmoud v. Taylor - Dissenting Opinion - Sotomayor - June 27, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that public schools burden parents’ religious exercise when they compel elementary school children to participate in instruction on gender and sexuality against their parents’ religious convictions and without notice or opportunity to opt out. | — | ||||||
| 6/27/25 | ![]() 24-316 - Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. - Opinion Announcement - June 27, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the structure of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force does not violate the Constitution’s Appointments Clause. | — | ||||||
| 6/27/25 | ![]() 24-354 - Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers’ Research - Opinion Announcement - June 27, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that Congress did not violate the nondelegation doctrine in the way it gave power to the FCC to collect Universal Service Fund money, nor did the FCC violate the Constitution by letting a private, industry-controlled company make those collection decisions. | — | ||||||
| 6/27/25 | ![]() 24A884 - Trump v. CASA Inc. - Dissenting Opinion - Sotomayor - June 27, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that federal district courts likely lack equitable authority under the Judiciary Act of 1789 to issue universal injunctions that prohibit enforcement of executive actions beyond the parties before the court. | — | ||||||
| 6/26/25 | ![]() 23-1002 - Hewitt v. United States - Opinion Announcement - June 26, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the First Step Act’s sentencing reduction provisions apply to a defendant whose original sentence was imposed before the Act’s enactment, then vacated and resentenced to a new term of imprisonment after the Act’s enactment. | — | ||||||
| 6/26/25 | ![]() 23-1270 - Riley v. Bondi - Opinion Announcement - June 26, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the 30-day filing deadline in 8 U.S.C. § 1252(b)(1) is a mandatory claims-processing rule, not a jurisdictional requirement, and the Board of Immigration Appeals’ order denying Convention Against Torture (CAT) relief in a withholding-only proceeding is not a “final order of removal” for purposes of triggering this deadline. | — | ||||||
| 6/26/25 | ![]() 23-1275 - Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic - Opinion Announcement - June 26, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the Medicaid Act’s “any qualified provider” provision does not unambiguously confer a private right upon a Medicaid beneficiary to choose a specific provider and therefore cannot be enforced via § 1983. | — | ||||||
| 6/26/25 | ![]() 23-7809 - Gutierrez v. Saenz - Opinion Announcement - June 26, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that a Texas death-row inmate has standing to sue the state over its refusal to give him access to DNA testing. | — | ||||||
| 6/20/25 | ![]() 23-1187 - Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. - Opinion Announcement - June 20, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the Tobacco Control Act’s provision that “any person adversely affected” by the FDA’s denial of a marketing application may seek judicial review extends to retailers who would sell the new tobacco product, not just the manufacturers who applied for approval. | — | ||||||
Want analysis for the episodes below?Free for Pro Submit a request, we'll have your selected episodes analyzed within an hour. Free, at no cost to you, for Pro users. | |||||||||
| 6/20/25 | ![]() 23-1226 - McLaughlin Chiropractic Associates, Inc. v. McKesson Corporation - Opinion Announcement - June 20, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the Hobbs Act does not preclude judicial review of an agency's statutory interpretation in district court enforcement proceedings, and district courts must independently determine whether the agency's interpretation is correct under ordinary principles of statutory interpretation. | — | ||||||
| 6/20/25 | ![]() 23-997 - Stanley v. City of Sanford, Florida - Opinion Announcement - June 20, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the Americans with Disabilities Act does not permit a former employee—who was qualified to perform her job and who earned post-employment benefits while employed—to sue over discrimination with respect to those benefits. | — | ||||||
| 6/20/25 | ![]() 24-20 - Fuld v. Palestine Liberation Organization - Opinion Announcement - June 20, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the personal jurisdiction provision of the Promoting Security and Justice for Victims of Terrorism Act does not violate the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. | — | ||||||
| 6/20/25 | ![]() 24-7 - Diamond Alternative Energy LLC v. Environmental Protection Agency - Opinion Announcement - June 20, 2025 | A case in which the Court will decide whether a party may establish the redressability component of Article III standing by pointing to the coercive and predictable effects of regulation on third parties. | — | ||||||
| 6/18/25 | ![]() 23-1067 - Oklahoma v. Environmental Protection Agency - Opinion Announcement - June 18, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit does not necessarily have exclusive jurisdiction to review an Environmental Protection Agency action that affects only one state or region, simply because the EPA published that action alongside actions affecting other states in a single Federal Register notice. | — | ||||||
| 6/18/25 | ![]() 23-1229 - Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLC - Opinion Announcement - June 18, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that challenges by small oil refineries seeking exemptions from the requirements of the Clean Air Act’s Renewable Fuel Standard program should be heard exclusively in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit when the agency’s denial actions are “nationally applicable” or “based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect.” | — | ||||||
| 6/18/25 | ![]() 23-1300 - Nuclear Regulatory Commission v. Texas - Opinion Announcement - June 18, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that a nonparty cannot challenge a federal agency’s “final order” under the Hobbs Act’s judicial review provision and that federal nuclear laws allow the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to license private companies to store spent nuclear fuel at off-reactor sites. | — | ||||||
| 6/18/25 | ![]() 23-1324 - Perttu v. Richards - Opinion Announcement - June 18, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that, in cases subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act, prisoners have a right to a jury trial concerning their exhaustion of administrative remedies where disputed facts regarding exhaustion are intertwined with the underlying merits of their claim. | — | ||||||
| 6/18/25 | ![]() 23-477 - United States v. Skrmetti - Opinion Announcement - June 18, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that Tennessee Senate Bill 1, which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. | — | ||||||
| 6/18/25 | ![]() 23-477 - United States v. Skrmetti - Dissenting Opinion - Sotomayor - June 18, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that Tennessee Senate Bill 1, which prohibits all medical treatments intended to allow “a minor to identify with, or live as, a purported identity inconsistent with the minor’s sex” or to treat “purported discomfort or distress from a discordance between the minor’s sex and asserted identity,” does not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. | — | ||||||
| 6/12/25 | ![]() 23-1345 - Rivers v. Guerrero - Opinion Announcement - June 12, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that 28 U.S.C. § 2244(b)(2)—which strictly limits the circumstances in which an inmate can file a second petition for federal post-conviction relief—applies to all second habeas petitions. | — | ||||||
| 6/12/25 | ![]() 24-249 - A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279 - Opinion Announcement - June 12, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 and Rehabilitation Act of 1973 do not require children with disabilities to satisfy a heightened “bad faith or gross misjudgment” standard when seeking relief for discrimination relating to their education. | — | ||||||
| 6/12/25 | ![]() 24-275 - Parrish v. United States - Opinion Announcement - June 12, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that a party who files a notice of appeal during the period between when their original appeal deadline expired and when the court reopens their time to appeal need not file a second notice after the reopening is granted. | — | ||||||
| 6/12/25 | ![]() 24-320 - Soto v. United States - Opinion Announcement - June 12, 2025 | A case in which the Court held that the statute that provides combat-related special compensation (CRSC) to disabled veterans establishes its own settlement process for claims, which supersedes the Barring Act’s default six-year statute of limitations for most claims against the federal government. | — | ||||||
| 6/12/25 | ![]() 24-362 - Martin v. United States - Opinion Announcement - June 12, 2025 | A case in which the Court will held that (1) the Supremacy Clause does not afford the United States a defense in a suit against it under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2671 et seq., and (2) the law enforcement proviso in §2680(h) of the FTCA overrides only the intentional-tort exception in that subsection, not the discretionary-function exception or other exceptions throughout § 2680. | — | ||||||
Showing 25 of 89
Sponsor Intelligence
Sign in to see which brands sponsor this podcast, their ad offers, and promo codes.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
Chart Positions
1 placement across 1 market.
