
Dwarkesh Podcast
Deeply researched interviews www.dwarkesh.com
AI overview.Dwarkesh Patel is an independent podcast creator known for his insightful discussions that bridge technology and science. He has gained recognition for his abil…
Insights from recent episode analysis
On the show
- Dylan Patel2 eps
- Ada Palmer2 eps
- Reiner Pope2 eps
Also: Jensen Huang, Michael Nielsen, Terence Tao, Dario Amodei, Elon Musk, Adam Marblestone, David Reich, Eric Jang, Alex Imas, Phil Trammell, Adam Brown, Grant Sanderson, Ajeya Cotra, Ryan Greenblatt
Audience Interest
- technology advancements
- scientific discoveries
Podcast Focus
- interviews with experts
- technology insights
Publishing Consistency
- active for 5 years
- weekly episode releases
Insights are generated by CastFox AI using publicly available data, episode content, and proprietary models.
Most discussed topics
Brands & references
Total monthly reach
Based on 3 signals.
Built from
By chart position
- 🇺🇸United States · TechnologyHOME#6238K to 1.3M
- 🇬🇧United Kingdom · Technology#333K to 173K
- 🇨🇦Canada · Technology#513K to 69K
- 🇩🇪Germany · Technology#612K to 63K
- 🇦🇺Australia · Technology#510K to 54K
- Per-Episode Audience
Est. listeners per new episode within ~30 days
368K to 1.9M🎙 Daily cadence·139 episodes·Last published 6d ago - Monthly Reach
Unique listeners across all episodes (30 days)
1.2M to 6.5M🇺🇸65%🇬🇧9%🇨🇦4%+12 more - Active Followers
Loyal subscribers who consistently listen
674K to 3.6M5.7K real followers tracked across platforms
Market Insights
Platform Distribution
Reach across major podcast platforms, updated hourly
Total Followers
—
Total Plays
—
Total Reviews
—
* Data sourced directly from platform APIs and aggregated hourly across all major podcast directories.
| Date | Episode | Topics | Guests | Brands | Places | Keywords | Sponsor | Length | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10/22/26 | What will computer chips look like in 2045? | I spent two days touring Intel’s most advanced fab and talking to its technical leadership to understand what the chips of the future will look like.A lot of what's coming next – gate-all-around transistors, backside power, CFET, hybrid bonding – is hard to follow without actually seeing it, so we made all the awesome animated explainers that I wish I had while I was prepping.I also asked Intel’s leadership how the semiconductor industry will cope with the enormous shock in demand from AI.AI compute has grown 3x a year for the last decade, but according to Intel's CTO, Intel could only double leading-edge wafer production with today’s global stock of chipmaking tools.What kinds of tricks can foundries pull to extend this crossover point where demand surges way ahead of supply?This was a totally new format for us - hope you enjoy!I also made flashcards for the concepts I had to learn to prep for this episode here.Watch on YouTube; read the transcript.SponsorsWorkOS helps you do business with enterprises. It gives you access to all the features most commonly required by enterprises: SSO, SCIM, RBAC, audit logs, and more. It’s easy to plug these features in — it only takes a few lines of code — and WorkOS is releasing new functionality all the time, including things like auth for agents. If you want to join the 3,000+ companies that rely on WorkOS, go to workos.comJane Street built a powerful tool called magic-trace to help analyze and debug their trading systems. It only exists because one engineer noticed a feature on Intel chips called Processor Trace and thought it’d be valuable to build on top of. Now, traders and developers across Jane Street use magic-trace every single day! If you want to be trusted to pursue the ideas you think matter most, Jane Street is hiring. Go to janestreet.com/dwarkeshAntithesis’ testing platform lets you perfectly reproduce every single bug you find. That’s because it runs on a fully deterministic computer, which strips out all the unpredictability that can make certain bugs flaky and hard to pin down. To build it, Antithesis found every source of non-determinism in Intel’s x86 architecture and either sealed it off or replaced it with a controlled simulation. Learn more at antithesis.com/dwarkeshTimestamps(00:00:00) – Intro(00:00:47) – How Intel brings up a new process node(00:03:22) – What Intel learned from 10nm(00:06:28) – From planar transistors to gate-all-around(00:13:13) – Why High-NA EUV pays off for Intel but not TSMC(00:19:20) – Could chips have evolved completely differently?(00:23:33) – Inside Intel’s “Hot Topics” meeting(00:29:30) – Replacing copper wires with ruthenium(00:32:41) – Why stacked transistors take a decade to ship(00:39:45) – Hybrid bonding and the chip-to-chip bottleneck(00:48:00) – There aren’t enough tools to 10x chip production(00:53:14) – Can Intel catch up to TSMC?(01:01:02) – Terafab, and rethinking the fab from scratch This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.dwarkesh.com | 1h 09m 00s | ||||||
| 10/1/26 | Si Sheppard – How did a few hundred Spanish soldiers topple two empires? | New episode with military historian Si Sheppard.The conquests of the Aztec and Inca empires might be the most shocking events in human history.Hernan Cortés and some hundreds of Conquistadors landed on a new continent they knew basically nothing about, and within 2 and a half years, conquered the 6 million strong Aztec empire.Then, a decade later, Francisco Pizarro did the same thing to an Incan Empire of some 10 million inhabitants.In both cases, the Conquistadors consistently beat native armies while being literally 100x (or even in some cases 1000x) outnumbered - and in many cases, did so without taking a single casualty.And they did this with 99% of their military forces being made up of the very natives they were trying to subjugate.We often forget how wild human history is. People talk about AI takeover as if it would be some crazy, unprecedented sci-fi outcome. But this would not be the first time an alien force whose motives the defenders barely understand use more advanced technology and diplomatic cunning to outmaneuver and then take over a much larger and long established existing order.Watch on YouTube; read the transcript.Sponsors* Jane Street’s intern projects are even more ambitious than I realized. One intern spent his summer researching LLM memorization, figuring out how to quantify and reduce it. This matters because, when Jane Street tests their models on historical data, they need to know that performance reflects predictive power, not just memorized outcomes. Another intern spent his time developing a new activation checkpointing scheme: his custom version ended up outperforming PyTorch’s native one. If you want to read about more 2026 intern projects or apply for Jane Street’s 2027 internships, go to janestreet.com/dwarkesh* Grok Bot can tackle the tasks you’ve been meaning to handle but just haven’t gotten around to. For example, SpaceXAI recently gave Grok Bot access to their procurement contracts, vendor spend, and usage data: it ended up identifying over $100,000 in potential savings for them. I decided to try this on my own spend, and Grok Bot found over $5,000 of savings for me, even though I run a pretty small team. Try it out yourself at x.ai/bot* Antithesis solves one of the biggest problems with traditional software testing: to test for a bug, you first have to be able to imagine it. Antithesis runs your system through thousands of parallel histories and steers your tests for you, injecting faults and generally trying to make everything as adversarial as possible. That way, your software gets tested against scenarios you’d never imagine but that could still arise in the real world. Learn more at antithesis.com/dwarkeshTimestamps(00:00:00) – Cortés’s conquest of the Aztecs(00:22:39) – Pizarro’s conquest of the Inca(00:26:59) – Explaining Conquistador military superiority(00:34:39) – Could the natives have beat the Conquistadors?(00:48:56) – The Aztecs and Incas did not get to learn from each other(00:56:11) – Why Spain still lost in the long run(01:07:47) – Why didn’t the Aztecs/Incas adapt better to European warfare?(01:14:16) – Conquistador motivation(01:26:22) – Why Mughal India also couldn’t play the Europeans off each other(01:33:42) – Diplomacy was just as important as technology This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.dwarkesh.com | 1h 37m 23s | ||||||
| 9/17/26 | Noam Brown – Agent swarms, alignment, & recursive self-improvement | New episode with Noam Brown.We talk about multi-agent, Navier-Stokes, and what the current explosion of maths progress tells us about what happens once you automate AI research.And we also discuss how we will know if the models are actually aligned before we kick off RSI.Watch on YouTube; read the transcript.Sponsors* Jane Street has been interested in AI for a lot longer than you’d think, and not just for trading. In 2011, a full year before AlexNet and over a decade before ChatGPT launched, they hosted the first FOOM Debate between Eliezer Yudkowsky and Robin Hanson on whether AI would lead to an intelligence explosion. Now Jane Street is revisiting the question with a new panel: Daniel Kokotajlo, Ege Erdil, Ryan Greenblatt, and Jaime Sevilla, hosted by Ron Minsky in San Francisco this October. I expect it to be a truly excellent conversation. Register at janestreet.com/dwarkesh* Grok Bot has made handing off work super easy. It runs on its own cloud computer, where it installs the tools it needs to handle tasks end-to-end. For the podcast, we use Grok Bot to help produce our videos. You may have noticed that our ads feature animations of real websites. Getting these pixel-perfect used to mean running a convoluted, multi-step workflow ourselves. Now we just let Grok Bot handle it. Best of all, Grok Bot has learned all of our specs and preferences, so we don’t have to redescribe the task each time! Try Grok Bot for yourself at x.ai/bot* Antithesis gives you the confidence of a giant test suite without actually having to write one. Say you’re doing a major backend refactor: building enough tests to trust it could take weeks. Antithesis solves this by running your software through countless simulated worlds, injecting faults and hunting for failures. On any PR, you can turn a dial to decide exactly how much testing you want. And because every run is fully deterministic, agents can branch off the moment a bug appears, rewind it, inspect memory, and replay it, all while the original test keeps running. Learn more at antithesis.com/dwarkeshTimestamps(00:00:00) – Multi-agent and Navier-Stokes(00:15:28) – How will AI firms work?(00:22:02) – What math progress tells us about recursive self improvement(00:40:22) – Hugging Face and alignment(01:01:18) – The internal/external model gap(01:08:34) – Chain of thought is degrading(01:14:12) – How will we know when alignment is solved? This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.dwarkesh.com | 1h 20m 10s | ||||||
| 9/11/26 | AI researchers debate how close we are to recursive self-improvement | New episode with John Schulman, Beren Millidge and Charlie O’Neill. I got together with some of the most insightful AI researchers I know who are at the openish companies, because I wanted to hear the details of what's actually happening at the frontier and what comes next.Watch on YouTube; read the transcript.Sponsors* Antithesis helps you trust your code. As agents generate more and more of your software, the bottleneck shifts from your engineers actually writing code to verifying it. Antithesis does that testing for you. Ron Minsky, who co-leads Jane Street’s tech group, told me that Antithesis was able to help his team shake out bugs in software that had already undergone heavy review. If you want to see how it fits into your development process, go to antithesis.com/dwarkesh* Grok Bot has been a great way to hand off tasks. My team uses it as a producer: whenever my editor posts a rough cut of an interview in Slack, Grok Bot opens the transcript on its own computer, matches my notes to the exact moments they refer to, and uses a file of my preferences to suggest edits. Then it sends me its top clip candidates so I can review everything from my phone, which saves my editors from sorting through hours of footage. Try Grok Bot for yourself at x.ai/bot* Jane Street just launched its most ambitious competition yet: design a protocol-emulator ASIC. Basically, if you have a chip you want to test outside of a live system, you should be able to connect it to your design and have it simulate realistic traffic. Jane Street wants general-purpose, reprogrammable designs that can work across multiple protocols and remain useful as new ones emerge. The most novel submissions will actually get taped out, and the winners will receive a physical copy! The competition is open until January 18, 2027, and teams are encouraged. To get started download the template code at janestreet.com/dwarkeshTimestamps(00:00:00) – Steelmanning the case against RSI(00:18:39) – What’s driving the Chinese labs’ progress(00:28:06) – How will automated AI researchers be trained(00:33:51) – Will long-horizon RL elicit AGI?(00:45:24) – The sim-to-real gap(01:00:33) – How much progress is explained by data?(01:18:03) – Why is RL working so well?(01:24:54) – Move 37 and entropy collapse(01:28:32) – Rapid-fire timelines This is a public episode. If you would like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit www.dwarkesh.com | 1h 37m 01s | ||||||
| 9/1/26 | AI safetythreat modeling+5 | Ajeya Cotra | Mixture-of-KittensMETR+3 | — | AIsafety+5 | Jane StreetCODE | 2h 20m 33s | ||
| 8/31/26 | agent civilizationstechnology+3 | — | — | — | agent civilizationstechnology+3 | — | 24m 40s | ||
| 8/25/26 | AI computelab economics+3 | Dylan Patel | AnthropicOpenAI | — | AI capexFLOPs+3 | Grok BotCODE | 1h 16m 53s | ||
| 8/11/26 | AI researchtechnical AI safety+4 | Ryan Greenblatt | Redwood ResearchOpenAI+1 | — | AI safetyrecursive self-improvement+7 | — | 2h 12m 32s | ||
| 8/7/26 | continual learningpredictions+3 | — | — | — | predictionscontinual learning+3 | — | 8m 37s | ||
| 8/3/26 | AI modelscompute prices+3 | — | CommandQuickBooks+1 | — | AIcompute prices+3 | MercuryCOMMAND | 11m 18s | ||
| 7/10/26 | general relativityblack holes+3 | Adam Brown | Google DeepMind | — | general relativityblack holes+5 | Jane Street | 1h 38m 24s | ||
| 6/30/26 | AImathematics+4 | Grant Sanderson | — | — | AImathematics+4 | Gemini 3.5 Live TranslateCODE | 1h 33m 39s | ||
| 6/26/26 | AI learningautomation+3 | — | — | — | AIlearning+5 | Mercury | 19m 53s | ||
| 6/19/26 | AI progresssample efficiency+2 | — | Command | — | AIsample efficiency+4 | Mercury | 11m 57s | ||
| 6/16/26 | Machiavellipolitics+4 | Ada Palmer | FlorenceMedici | — | Machiavellipolitics+5 | — | 2h 08m 20s | ||
| 6/4/26 | AGIeconomics+4 | Alex ImasPhil Trammell | Gemini OmniGemini app+3 | — | AGIeconomics+4 | Jane StreetCODE | 1h 16m 08s | ||
| 5/22/26 | chip designGPUs+5 | Reiner Pope | MatXGoogle+1 | — | chip designlogic gates+5 | Crusoedwarkesh | 1h 20m 30s | ||
| 5/15/26 | AlphaGoAI tools+3 | Eric Jang | — | — | AlphaGoAI+5 | Cursor | 2h 37m 29s | ||
| 5/8/26 | human evolutionancient DNA+4 | David Reich | — | CaucasusEurope+1 | Bronze Agenatural selection+4 | — | 2h 13m 20s | ||
| 4/29/26 | LLMsAI training+3 | Reiner Pope | Gemma 4MatX+1 | — | LLMsAI+6 | Jane Street | 2h 13m 50s | ||
| 4/15/26 | TPU competitionNvidia supply chain+4 | Jensen Huang | Blackwell GPUsNvidia | — | TPUNvidia+5 | Crusoedwarkesh | 1h 43m 12s | ||
| 4/7/26 | scientific progresshistory of science+3 | Michael Nielsen | Earth | — | scientific progressverification loop+5 | — | 2h 03m 03s | ||
| 3/20/26 | mathematical discoveryplanetary motion+3 | Terence Tao | Mercury | — | KeplerNewton+5 | Jane Streetdwarkesh | 1h 23m 44s | ||
| 3/13/26 | AI computescaling challenges+4 | Dylan Patel | SemiAnalysisNvidia+1 | — | AIcompute+5 | Mercury | 2h 30m 44s | ||
| 3/11/26 | AIsurveillance+3 | — | AnthropicThe Pentagon | — | AIAnthropic+5 | — | 24m 38s | ||
| 3/6/26 | Renaissance historyprinting revolution+4 | Ada Palmer | University of ChicagoInventing the Renaissance | FlorenceWittenberg+2 | RenaissanceGutenberg+7 | — | 2h 02m 19s | ||
| 2/13/26 | AGIscaling hypothesis+4 | Dario Amodei | Anthropic | — | AGIscaling hypothesis+5 | Labelboxdwarkesh | 2h 22m 20s | ||
| 2/5/26 | AI in spaceorbital data centers+4 | Elon Musk | DOGEOptimus+1 | — | AIspace+5 | Mercurypersonal-banking | 2h 49m 45s | ||
| 12/30/25 | AIneuroscience+4 | Adam Marblestone | Convergent ResearchGoogle Deepmind | — | AIneuroscience+5 | Gemini 3 ProCODE | 1h 49m 53s | ||
| 12/23/25 | AI progresshuman labor+4 | — | Thoughts on AI progress (Dec 2025) | — | AIhuman labor+3 | — | 12m 28s | ||
Showing 30 of 139
Pitch Fit is a Pro feature
See how bookable this show is for guests, which brands already advertise, the per-episode ad value, and the best-fit guest and sponsor profile. The numbers are blurred on the free plan.
How readily this show books outside guests like you.
How proven this show is for host-read sponsorships.
For Guests
ProFor Advertisers
ProUpgrade to Pro to unlock guest cadence, sponsor categories, fit scores, and per-episode ad value for this show.
Similar Audience Demographics
Podcasts that attract a similar listener profile
Distribution & Reach
About the show, platforms, and key insights.
Distribution & Reach
About the show, platforms, and key insights.
Dwarkesh Patel is an independent podcast creator known for his insightful discussions that bridge technology and science. He has gained recognition for his ability to engage with complex topics and present them in an accessible manner, often featuring expert guests from various fields. The Dwarkesh Podcast stands out for its deeply researched interviews, delving into cutting-edge developments and philosophical questions within the realms of technology and science. The format typically includes in-depth conversations, allowing for comprehensive exploration of subjects that resonate with contemporary issues and innovative ideas. The podcast appeals to a diverse audience, including tech enthusiasts, academics, and curious minds seeking to understand the implications of modern advancements. Listeners appreciate the intellectual rigor and the nuanced perspectives offered, making it a valuable resource for anyone interested in the intersection of technology and science.
By the numbers
- Total followers: 5.7K
- Total plays: 93K
- Total reviews: 484
Platforms
TuneIn
- Followers: 107
Castbox
- Followers: 4.0K
- Plays: 93K
- Reviews: 8
YouTube
- Subscribers: 2
- Views: 195
- Videos: 23
Podcast App
- Followers: 551
- Reviews: 475
Podcast Republic
- Followers: 1.0K
- Reviews: 1
Find them online
Audience
professionals
Key insights
What the show covers
- interviews with experts
- technology insights
- science exploration
- critical thinking topics
Audience interests
- technology advancements
- scientific discoveries
- in-depth interviews
- research-driven discussions
Platform reach
- available on TuneIn
- available on Castbox
- available on YouTube
- available on PodcastApp
Publishing consistency
- active for 5 years
- weekly episode releases
- 123 total episodes
- consistent content delivery
Chart history for Dwarkesh Podcast
Peaked at #1 in IS, top 10 in 26 of 49 tracked markets, currently #1 in IS.
| Market | Genre | Peak | Current | Trend |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IS | — | #1 | #1 | — |
| CH | — | #2 | #2 | — |
| United Kingdom | — | #3 | #3 | — |
| Finland | — | #3 | #3 | — |
| New Zealand | — | #4 | #4 | — |
| PH | — | #4 | #4 | — |
| Canada | — | #5 | #5 | — |
| Australia | — | #5 | #5 | — |
| GR | — | #5 | #5 | — |
| TH | — | #5 | #5 | — |
| NG | — | #5 | #5 | — |
| United States | — | #6 | #6 | — |
| Germany | — | #6 | #6 | — |
| BE | — | #6 | #6 | — |
| Norway | — | #6 | #6 | — |
| SG | — | #6 | #6 | — |
| Ireland | — | #7 | #7 | — |
| Italy | — | #7 | #7 | — |
| Netherlands | — | #7 | #7 | — |
| PT | — | #7 | #7 | — |
Chart Positions
49 placements across 49 markets.
Chart Positions
49 placements across 49 markets.